so? i view international and club as two different things really
and it therefore isn't the pinnacle of basketball, i mean this USA team is trashing everyone and it hasn't even got it's biggest stars in it.
How can you call that the pinnacle.
so? i view international and club as two different things really
because it's the most important basektball tournament for national teams
Nope international sport has to the top for the players.because it's the most important basektball tournament for national teams
Yeah buts it's not for the majority of potential gold.medal winners. Best of the reSt isn't good enough for the Olympics.i'd say for the overwhelming number of players in the basketball tournament this is the pinnacle of their sport
i'd say for the overwhelming number of players in the basketball tournament this is the pinnacle of their sport
i guess we're just gonna disagree cause i see a difference between international and club sport and you guys don't
Yup it's cultural thing European consider international honours above all else. Americans think club level is equal and they are not.i guess we're just gonna disagree cause i see a difference between international and club sport and you guys don't
This made me laugh
brazilians are asking for an olympic truce.
Hell no.
No punching, no fighting, of course, but rivalry has its place and i for one, love it. I find the offer so humiliating i'd place it besides the 7-1 from last WC.
I think that the pinnacle is the tournament every top player is willing to give up the most to win.
Most top players (Federer excluded) will only have three oportunities at most in their lifetime to compete with chances at an olympic event, and that's why they want to win it so badly.
Yup it's cultural thing European consider international honours above all else. Americans think club level is equal and they are not.
If the prize is Olympic Gold, then Federer has already won one in the Doubles in 2008. Players play both singles, doubles to win a medal at the Olympics. On the men's side the top players, in today's game now would never play doubles, if they are in contention to win the singles in the Grand Slams I.e. They give up playing the doubles to give them the best chance to win the singles.
I know, i've seen the video. I'm not advocating violence. The Argentine guy involved was a moron, by any definition, and if it were up to me, i'd make him spend the night in jail just to make an example out of him, but asking the rest of the world to adjust their behaviour because of one idiot is a stretch. In Spanish terms, es nivelar para abajo. You can enjoy rivalry without behaving like a ****.
Because Djokovic has won grand slams and hasn't won the Olympics singles medal. Again, ask any player who hasn't won or ask kids who are starting to play tennis, and 100 out of a 100 will tell you that their dream is to win a Grand Slam, maybe an odd one out will mention the Davis cup, but no one will mention the Olympic games.So you are saying that winning an olympic medal is so important for them that they give out an effort they are not willing to give in the Grand Slams... I wonder why that is...
Agreed. I just disagree on how to deal with it.The point is that a line has been crossed, and it needs to be dealt with somehow.
Right now I am feeling very bitter about the New Zealand's sevens setup. Even if we manage to now get through, we surely don't deserve the medal based on the effort of the NZRU.