Would the coaching staff ever consider doing that?...would rather he pulled out the team if that's the case
Two questions:
1) do you expect Ireland to put the same amount of pressure as, say, NZ?
2) That plan didn't appear to work against Italy, despite Italy losing a lot of balls to Irish high kicks because of own (unforced) handling errors. Why do you think that was?
When Ireland have their tails up, they are one of the best teams at putting pressure. It happens rarely but as I mentioned before the French game (11 vs Eng, 13 vs NZ, 14 vs Wales and 15 vs England) - they play like men possessed.
Can they summon the energy to do it again against a physical Argentina? I suspect POC will galvanize them to do it. Problem is..SOB, POM and POC are the best at this.
Problem is any poor kicks (I agree with Every Time Ref) will gift some extremely talented Pumas space and possession. However, unlike Tonga and Namibia, it isn't likely they can score from their own 22 past Tommy B and D Kearney.
I understand your logic, but we start from different premises. We obviously see very different things in Argentina. About 1), i think that, considering the alternatives, that plays in Argentina's favor. I much rather face a relentless rucking team than someone who comes at us and plays wide. Maybe i'm too confident in our forwards. I will give you their line out is better, but i'm not particularly worried about rucks, mauls or scrums.1) In a different way, yes. NZ attack wide (once they're in the attacking third), Ireland tend to keep coming round the corner, rucking aggressively and going again and again, building pressure until something breaks. Not to say they are as good overall as the All Blacks, but as I said their particular gameplan is built on pressure and Argentina struggle with relieving pressure
2) I didn't watch that game unfortunately. As I understand it, Ireland played poorly and didn't keep that pressure on as they normally would; Italy probably defend more aggressively than Argentina which may have contributed, perhaps they also kicked better (although if Haimona was 10 I doubt it ... )
This is just my observation of course, I'd be interested to know if you agree as someone who I assume watches more Argentina games than me (although I try to catch as many as possible)
So what is the inside word on Sexton? Last I read someone who seemed close to the team was saying he was throwing up post the France game and therefore it seemed he had concussion but that the Irish were trying to cover that up with a different injury. Eitehr way, whether Sexton plays or not seems to me to be key for this game, particulalry with the other big losses Ireland have had for this game.
Thanks for the response
I understand your logic, but we start from different premises. We obviously see very different things in Argentina. About 1), i think that, considering the alternatives, that plays in Argentina's favor. I much rather face a relentless rucking team than someone who comes at us and plays wide. Maybe i'm too confident in our forwards. I will give you their line out is better, but i'm not particularly worried about rucks, mauls or scrums.
You mention the pressure Ireland will put on us but i think you are overlooking the pressure we can put on them. Look the all black's game. The try and both of the ABs yellow cards came from the pressure we put on them.
About point 2) i find it hard to agree with that. I don't think Italy's defense is more aggressive than Argentina's.
Last, i think (sorry, hope) pressure will play to our advantage. We are the underdogs (using betting stats as the closest proxy), we are playing further away from home, there will less fans in the stadium. We tend to do ok under those circumstances. Then add injuries and citations to the equation.
A concern I have is concentration during the first 5-10 minutes. Can't really point my finger on why, thou. Maybe it was Namibia's game, although that was more of a training exercise (for both).
Don't get me wrong, not saying we will win, but i can't help it but to smile when i see an overconfident irish fan. Doing my best to put my bias aside, i'd say it's 50-50.
I can't help but feel you've said this before...maybe give it a rest? Everyone knows you believe Irish fans are undeservedly cocky at every WC now, so you've gotten your message through.
Anyway based on the what we know at the moment I imagine it'll be a team of
1. Healy (although I'd rather McGrath starts)
2. Best
3. Ross
4. Toner
5. Henderson
6. Murphy
7. Henry
8. Heaslip
9. Murray
10. Sexton
11. D. Kearney
12. Henshaw
13. Earls
14. Bowe
15. Kearney
16. Strauss
17. McGrath
18. White
19. Ryan
20. Ruddock
21. Reddan
22. Madigan
23. Fitzgerald
I'm very nervous for this game, it'll take a huge amount of accuracy and intensity but we're definitely capable of getting the result (I know so cocky!!!!). As others have said it will definitely be an incredible atmosphere.
Thanks for the response
I understand your logic, but we start from different premises. We obviously see very different things in Argentina. About 1), i think that, considering the alternatives, that plays in Argentina's favor. I much rather face a relentless rucking team than someone who comes at us and plays wide. Maybe i'm too confident in our forwards. I will give you their line out is better, but i'm not particularly worried about rucks, mauls or scrums.
You mention the pressure Ireland will put on us but i think you are overlooking the pressure we can put on them. Look the all black's game. The try and both of the ABs yellow cards came from the pressure we put on them.
About point 2) i find it hard to agree with that. I don't think Italy's defense is more aggressive than Argentina's.
Last, i think (sorry, hope) pressure will play to our advantage. We are the underdogs (using betting stats as the closest proxy), we are playing further away from home, there will less fans in the stadium. We tend to do ok under those circumstances. Then add injuries and citations to the equation.
A concern I have is concentration during the first 5-10 minutes. Can't really point my finger on why, thou. Maybe it was Namibia's game, although that was more of a training exercise (for both).
Don't get me wrong, not saying we will win, but i can't help it but to smile when i see an overconfident irish fan. Doing my best to put my bias aside, i'd say it's 50-50.
Scrums won't be a problem, I back Argentina there, mauls could go either way. It's not that I think you'll struggle with individual rucks but repeated rucks phase after phase I think you lack the line speed to reverse the tide. Maybe I'll turn out to be wrong, I hope so - I'm going to the game and supporting Argentina.
I definitely agree with you that it's about 50-50. Ireland slight favourites if you force me to choose, but neither result would be a shock.
The Pumas have been pretty great at rucking on defense, recovering many balls even though the tackles were failing hard. (I'm talking specially vs Tonga).
So Although I see your point, this could be decided on how well the Irish defend the ball at rucks.
Have never seen a rugby match at any level which was not decided around the ruck, thought Ireland's display against France was superb in that regard, Argentina are a fine team and are deserving the greatest respect but have been our intended fifth contest since the draw and are beatable. I strongly feel Sexton needs pulling and Jackson called in, I don't think Johnny's is 100% all comp, having admired Mads from afar since first sighting, POM's I see as our greatest loss, back rowers we do have.The Pumas have been pretty great at rucking on defense, recovering many balls even though the tackles were failing hard. (I'm talking specially vs Tonga).
So Although I see your point, this could be decided on how well the Irish defend the ball at rucks.
I can't help but feel you've said this before...maybe give it a rest? Everyone knows you believe Irish fans are undeservedly cocky at every WC now, so you've gotten your message through.
Anyway based on the what we know at the moment I imagine it'll be a team of
1. Healy (although I'd rather McGrath starts)
2. Best
3. Ross
4. Toner
5. Henderson
6. Murphy
7. Henry
8. Heaslip
9. Murray
10. Sexton
11. D. Kearney
12. Henshaw
13. Earls
14. Bowe
15. Kearney
16. Strauss
17. McGrath
18. White
19. Ryan
20. Ruddock
21. Reddan
22. Madigan
23. Fitzgerald
I'm very nervous for this game, it'll take a huge amount of accuracy and intensity but we're definitely capable of getting the result (I know so cocky!!!!). As others have said it will definitely be an incredible atmosphere.