Cootsee, oo as in 'boot, foot' etc and 'ee' as in 'beer, deer'Correct me if I'm wrong, Bokkes, but the right way to pronounce Coetzee is: catzÃ.
I know because Nobel Price of Literacy JM Coetzee came to Bs As this year and someone made a vine with him saying it well.
You're welcome, world.
Drop Farrell?
Look at Cook and Robson. Could be an idea. Bring Cipriani in!
Fill the centres with some kind of confidence?
Probably best to have this convo in the England thread.
The problem is....no matter what side runs out against Samoa and even if Ford or whoever has a sublime game....deep down we all know the side that will run out against Australia and who will start at 10.
And that's the worrying aspect of all this.
Yep that is the problem .....
...and what Lancaster has said....team still developing...no panic....nott lose nerve.....not deviate from coure we are on.....blah blaah blah!!!!!
Bet the tickets to watch England at the RWC quarters are looking dear now if you paid for them and find you are going to be watching Wales......................!!!
Just on this, it sounds ok on paper but in neither game did England have a shot at winning in the last 5 minutes. You're right to wait until the end of the series but if Australia beat you by 1, 2 or 3 points it's a disaster, not a case of we lost to the top three teams in the world by 6, 7 or 8 points. Two wins are essential for England otherwise the pressure keeps growing into the 6 nations which isn't good at all.Meh . We have lost against the best 2 teams in the world collectively by 5 points
Just on this, it sounds ok on paper but in neither game did England have a shot at winning in the last 5 minutes. You're right to wait until the end of the series but if Australia beat you by 1, 2 or 3 points it's a disaster, not a case of we lost to the top three teams in the world by 6, 7 or 8 points. Two wins are essential for England otherwise the pressure keeps growing into the 6 nations which isn't good at all.
Meh . We have lost against the best 2 teams in the world collectively by 5 points . Wales haven't played them yet .....
I'll save my judgement for 2 weeks time .
The disappointment comes from the way we played and that both games were within grasp and we played poorly in both imo
Not terribly relevant to be honest, and stop bringing Wales into it, it'll only derail the thread!
Our performance against New Zealand was better than yesterdays showing. Yesterday was a massive massive game for England and we were not able to step up, against probably the poorest Bok showing against us for many years.
What will 2 weeks time do to make this situation positive? The only way we can emerge in credit from this tour is to beat Australia with lotsof room to spare, scoring some excellent tries in the process with our backs. Given our set-piece is strong at present, we should expect to win. But it won't be very meaningful to win narrowly as Cmac points out, nor will it be particularly telling to win because of a big forward effort.
I bought wales into it because they are our first game in the 6N and cmac mentioned taking this pressure into it . All I mentioned was winning the first game of the 6N well and all this pressure will be gone for the short term . If we win the next 2 games well we will be off and away again
Off and away where, though? How can we demonstrate progress without winning games we were losing a year or two years, ago?
The best we can hope for is to equal the total of autumn wins from previous years, and that's only if we beat both Samoa and Oz. The only way to show proper improvement now in the six nations is by winning a grand slam. And that ain't likely given the away games in Cardiff and Dublin.