How dare you, Warren Gatland is the greatest rugby coach who has ever livedWell, given gatlands 0 and 8 record in super rugby Aotearoa games, he could do with a good coach, one who has a 4 and 0 record in super rugby competitions
How dare you, Warren Gatland is the greatest rugby coach who has ever livedWell, given gatlands 0 and 8 record in super rugby Aotearoa games, he could do with a good coach, one who has a 4 and 0 record in super rugby competitions
Well, given gatlands 0 and 8 record in super rugby Aotearoa games, he could do with a good coach, one who has a 4 and 0 record in super rugby competitions
Luckily Gatland has an exemplary record against SH opposition as a test coachYes, but test match rugby is different to Super rugby.
Sure, but after watching the chiefs this year I started seeing evidence of what folk on here complain about regarding gatland, as he took the most creative, free spirited, attacking side, drained them of their soul, resulting in a team that couldn’t create tries or breaks to save themselves. This wasn’t just a bunch of new players (there were new players, to be fair, mostly in the forwards) with no experience who gatland doesn’t know how to coach, these were experienced and creative geniuses like brad Weber, Damian McKenzie, and Anton lienert brown. The latter was playing like Jamie Roberts (yes, that’s a bad thing).Yes, but test match rugby is different to Super rugby. Test match rugby and Lions tests is a whole different level. Am sure Gatland is still getting used to coaching Super rugby level and club level rugby after his time with Wales.
And Lancaster is already in a more prestigious set up and any coach's wet dream so it's best for everyone really.Well, given gatlands 0 and 8 record in super rugby Aotearoa games, he could do with a good coach, one who has a 4 and 0 record in super rugby competitions
www.the42.ie
Why do you say that? the article says they have been talking to the prem but the Prem hasn’t budged. And It doesn’t seem unreasonable To ask that players be allowed to be released after their premiership is already over, ie they didn’t make the final. The players would surely want that.I would love to see him not pick any premiership players.
Have fun with that Gatland.
Almost like the Lions maybe needed to work with the prem a bit more instead of just saying
![]()
Why do you say that? the article says they have been talking to the prem but the Prem hasn’t budged. And It doesn’t seem unreasonable To ask that players be allowed to be released after their premiership is already over, ie they didn’t make the final. The players would surely want that.
seems like the prem just want to try and take advantage of their contractual rights in order to get the lions to give them a payout when any sense of human decency toward the players they contract would mean they would just allow them to be released despite the contract as it actually had no effect in the prem itself. I can Understand them not wanting to Bring the final forward, but not releasing players who aren’t in the final seems like a money grabbing exercise.
Perhaps it is a money grabbing exercise but the Lions makes a **** load of money and the clubs are risking their assets to make that money. Its business and I don't see why the clubs shouldn't push there luckWhy do you say that? the article says they have been talking to the prem but the Prem hasn’t budged. And It doesn’t seem unreasonable To ask that players be allowed to be released after their premiership is already over, ie they didn’t make the final. The players would surely want that.
seems like the prem just want to try and take advantage of their contractual rights in order to get the lions to give them a payout when any sense of human decency toward the players they contract would mean they would just allow them to be released despite the contract as it actually had no effect in the prem itself. I can Understand them not wanting to Bring the final forward, but not releasing players who aren’t in the final seems like a money grabbing exercise.
Likewise Gatland could accept English players missing one warmup, hell it's not like a premiership final is going to leave them undercooked or anything... If he is willing to not include English players from whatever the 2 best English clubs will be at the time (likely Exeter and A.N.Other) then he is shooting himself in the foot and likely was just looking for an excuse.Why do you say that? the article says they have been talking to the prem but the Prem hasn’t budged. And It doesn’t seem unreasonable To ask that players be allowed to be released after their premiership is already over, ie they didn’t make the final. The players would surely want that.
seems like the prem just want to try and take advantage of their contractual rights in order to get the lions to give them a payout when any sense of human decency toward the players they contract would mean they would just allow them to be released despite the contract as it actually had no effect in the prem itself. I can Understand them not wanting to Bring the final forward, but not releasing players who aren’t in the final seems like a money grabbing exercise.
But I would say They are hardly risking their assets. If a player that didn’t make the final plays against Japan they are at the same risk as someone who plays the final. Sure there are more players being risked but it’s not a big risk.Perhaps it is a money grabbing exercise but the Lions makes a **** load of money and the clubs are risking their assets to make that money. Its business and I don't see why the clubs shouldn't push there luck
I think you missed the point. He isn’t talking about the players in the final missing out, he is talking about the players who didn’t play the final not being released for the final week.Likewise Gatland could accept English players missing one warmup, hell it's not like a premiership final is going to leave them undercooked or anything... If he is willing to not include English players from whatever the 2 best English clubs will be at the time (likely Exeter and A.N.Other) then he is shooting himself in the foot and likely was just looking for an excuse.
Right, I didn’t have any historical context.It's not been a recent thing Gatland and Prem rugby have clashed over the lions since he's been in charge.
Suppose it depends on the championship schedule.Can someone fill me in on this. Does Sarries lads be excluded from this squibble as they won't be Prem Rugby.
Wasn't sure like who the issue is with as in do all Prem clubs stand unified on stance etcSuppose it depends on the championship schedule.
I think you missed the point. He isn’t talking about the players in the final missing out, he is talking about the players who didn’t play the final not being released for the final week.
Well he was talking about two different things, and my post Which you were responding to wasn’t talking about the one you are talking about. One is the issue of the final, and him wanting it to be brought forward, the other is about players not being available during finals week and that one is a problem if the prem doesn’t bring the final forward.He IS talking about players in the final missing out. His criteria was players who could not attend the warm up game against Japan risked not being in the Lions, that includes all the premiership finalists.