The big Kangaroo
Academy Player
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2010
- Messages
- 229
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Why does expressing dissatisfaction with the number of blow outs mean that people are looking for excuses? Ignoring the oft used "undercooked" worries, are you suggesting that the situation is satisfactory?
If we're speculating over the reasons for posts, what do you think the reason is for such a defensive stance from so many Aussies online?
No one likes to see massive blow out's but three tuff games should be enough for the lions to prepared for the walabies.it has just seemed to me that in the past British fans use the lack of player time together for your repeated series losses. In 2001 there were much more blowouts with only one tuff game before the first test and the lions did not come into the series "undercooked". So this year you have already had one close game and I would expect that there will be two more before the first test so yes I think the situation is satisfactory . Sorry I should of put a smilie face in to not seem so defensive but when you think compared to the wallabies it looks like we will have a 10 playing his second cap in that position and a bunch of players playing internatinal rugby for the first time this year and we have seen how that has goes with losses to soma and Scotland in the last two years. So I don't think having 3 big wins is going to make the test matches unfair for the lions.
Last edited: