What Happanes to the Tri natiouns trophy ??

[The big Kangaroo]

With Argentina making the tri nations the four nations next year what will happen to the trophy??

 

[smartcooky]

Goes permanently to the team with the most championships

New Zealand 10
South Africa 3
Australia 2

 

[SelimNiai]

Austrailia only won 2?!?!?!

I'm surprised at that tbh.

 

[smartcooky]

Austrailia only won 2?!?!?!

I'm surprised at that tbh.

Yep. 2000 and 2001.

 

[RoosTah]

Austrailia only won 2?!?!?!

I'm surprised at that tbh.

You have to remember who the opposition is... the wallabies are generally a very strong Rugby team by international standards, but the sport is still quite niche here and a couple injuries will completely disrupt most wallaby squads. We suffer a serious lack of depth stemming from a professional infrastructure that doesn't extend beyond the Super 14/15 teams and as a result the pool of talented full time professionals is very small. Also, it's worth pointing out that one of the ***les the Springboks got (2004 I think) was actually won on f&a as all three sides had won all their home games, meaning the thing would otherwise have been drawn.

Essentially what we have with the Tri Nations in Union represents the opposite of what existed in the Tri Nations in Rugby League. In that competition Australia was occasionally beaten by the odd Kiwi side or English side (not very often though - the English are intimidated by the Kangaroos and never seem to beat them), but basically have too much depth for the competition to be all that even.
This is essentially the case with the Union. The All Blacks just have too much depth and the side is too well drilled for anything but the odd victory by the Wallabies or Springboks. Though with the strength of SA rugby likely to only increase, this may change in the future. What will happen to Australia is anybody's guess as the game has lost serious headway to Rugby League over the past 5 years.

 

[dan the man]

NZ's hold on Rugby supremacy will be interesting to watch over the next 5-10 years... with Argentina entering the Southern Hemisphere comp. (Four Nations) It will really improve their game. Playing three tests against the three best teams in the world every year is an awesome opportunity for them. And the NH Teams are closing the gap. Once they have some key players who really play well (under the new laws) they will definitely start to put pressure on NZ, SA and AUS.
Very interesting times ahead

 

[RoosTah]

NZ's hold on Rugby supremacy will be interesting to watch over the next 5-10 years... with Argentina entering the Southern Hemisphere comp. (Four Nations) It will really improve their game. Playing three tests against the three best teams in the world every year is an awesome opportunity for them. And the NH Teams are closing the gap. Once they have some key players who really play well (under the new laws) they will definitely start to put pressure on NZ, SA and AUS.
Very interesting times ahead

Aren't they going to play two games each in the 4N? Or will it be like the 6N where they only play each side once?

 

[Seaton]

Aren't they going to play two games each in the 4N? Or will it be like the 6N where they only play each side once?

You're right at the first, a home and away game vs. each country, kind of like the Tri-Nations before 2007 (or 2006, I cannae mind)

 

[Black Heart]

Aren't they going to play two games each in the 4N? Or will it be like the 6N where they only play each side once?

It'll be pretty sad to decide the Bledisloe with one test lol.

 

[nickdnz]

It'll be pretty sad to decide the Bledisloe with one test lol.

What's more interesting than that, providing there will only be two tests instead of three Bledisloe Cup test (there were four this year, so that may reduce it back down to a respectable three), is that a team would have to win both matches, or at least one with a more significant margin(?), in order to take the Cup off of the defending champions.

 

[smartcooky]

What's more interesting than that, providing there will only be two tests instead of three Bledisloe Cup test (there were four this year, so that may reduce it back down to a respectable three), is that a team would have to win both matches, or at least one with a more significant margin(?), in order to take the Cup off of the defending champions.

Margins don't come into in a two-test Bledisloe.

You hold the Bled
You win the first match by 1
You lose the second match by10
You retain the Cup

 

[nickdnz]

Margins don't come into in a two-test Bledisloe.

You hold the Bled
You win the first match by 1
You lose the second match by10
You retain the Cup

But will there be a third Bledisloe Cup match next year? Otherwise it's going to be bloody hard for Australia to win the cup back.

 

[alexrugby]

Goes permanently to the team with the most championships

New Zealand 10
South Africa 3
Australia 2

Clever mind about Trophy destination

 

[azeli]

But will there be a third Bledisloe Cup match next year? Otherwise it's going to be bloody hard for Australia to win the cup back.

I read somewhere that there was going to be 3 tests for the Bledisloe? Don't quote me though...