- Joined
- Jun 23, 2017
- Messages
- 3,747
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Kilts all a tumble,Bet the rest of you lads are ******** the bed now aren't ya. The sleeping giant has finally woke up. Cymru am byth.
With laughter.
Probably jinxed it now.
Kilts all a tumble,Bet the rest of you lads are ******** the bed now aren't ya. The sleeping giant has finally woke up. Cymru am byth.
No thanks. Would prefer a tactician and he isn't seen as particularly successful here thanks to not being able to beat a depleted wales team, at home Englands own WC. Psychology is important in this decision.I still think Lancaster would be a great shout for Wales. He's often regarded as only being good with young players, but the Leinster players seemed to really rate him.
Yep lose to England and it'll be has Townsend taken the golden generation as far as possible. He's not made the most of it etc, etc.Kilts all a tumble,
With laughter.
Probably jinxed it now.
Then it's just Italy and France and our conquest is complete.Yep lose to England and it'll be has Townsend taken the golden generation as far as possible. He's not made the most of it etc, etc.
An Englishman in charge of Scotland would be more funny than it being Wales.
Unfortunately if Aus is too far from home for Schimdt then Wales is almost certainly a no. Then again you both have traditions around sheep so you never know...No thanks. Would prefer a tactician and he isn't seen as particularly successful here thanks to not being able to beat a depleted wales team, at home Englands own WC. Psychology is important in this decision.
I'd love Schmidt, he was excellent with Ireland, Aus more recently. Attention to detail etc.
Difference is the Aussies can catch the sheep, the Welsh at the moment ...Unfortunately if Aus is too far from home for Schimdt then Wales is almost certainly a no. Then again you both have traditions around sheep so you never know...![]()
Matt Sherratt is English!Then it's just Italy and France and our conquest is complete.
I think it should be renamed Gatland's Back PassageGatlands gates![]()
![]()
I think that's a bit unfair on Stu, he left England and Leinster in better places than he found them.No thanks. Would prefer a tactician and he isn't seen as particularly successful here thanks to not being able to beat a depleted wales team, at home Englands own WC. Psychology is important in this decision.
I'd love Schmidt, he was excellent with Ireland, Aus more recently. Attention to detail etc.
It does go into the bowels if the stadium, ie the car park haha. I wish he hadn't come back, I don't doubt he's done his best but what a record to blemishI think it should be renamed Gatland's Back Passage
Sorry, I've no doubt he's a good coach. Wales is still a goldfish bowl and pereception can often be as important as skill and competency.I think that's a bit unfair on Stu, he left England and Leinster in better places than he found them.
Not the guy to bring Wales back to winning Grand Slams but would be a great guy to build a squad and core competencies which looks like it could take at least 3-4 seasons.
I'd rather he goes to Munster to help strengthen Ireland though so I hope he stays put.
Easterby is an interesting one, I reckon he'll be on the blower to Farrell to see what his 2028 plans are before making any decision.
Disagree with EnglandI think that's a bit unfair on Stu, he left England and Leinster in better places than he found them.
Not the guy to bring Wales back to winning Grand Slams but would be a great guy to build a squad and core competencies which looks like it could take at least 3-4 seasons.
I'd rather he goes to Munster to help strengthen Ireland though so I hope he stays on that course.
Easterby is an interesting one, I reckon he'll be on the blower to Farrell to see what his 2028 plans are before making any decision.
I am sorry but lancaster is actually the perfect coach for where you are and what you need, a tactician is someone who will ice the cake but welsh rugby is at the stage of having to buy the ingredients. A tactician would do little to improve the outlook other than make the losses prettier.No thanks. Would prefer a tactician and he isn't seen as particularly successful here thanks to not being able to beat a depleted wales team, at home Englands own WC. Psychology is important in this decision.
I'd love Schmidt, he was excellent with Ireland, Aus more recently. Attention to detail etc.
I really don't want an Eddie Jones. I don't know how you got that from favouring Schmidt if I had the choice.I am sorry but lancaster is actually the perfect coach for where you are and what you need, a tactician is someone who will ice the cake but welsh rugby is at the stage of having to buy the ingredients. A tactician would do little to improve the outlook other than make the losses prettier.
You need a DOR, a nucifora, a rassie. Lancaster fits that bill, background in age grade rugby and development systems to help build the infrastructure to sort out the player pool mess. Even for england, eddies early sucess was built on lancaster's squad that he built. What you are saying is you want an eddie jones (of that time good god not now), without the person having built the squad for them to work with. Like Italy wouldnt be making the positive strides they are without the hires of connor oshea, francho smith and keiran crowley to help build the player pool.
He inherited a team that was in the news for poor behaviour and who were pretty poor. He took them to a side that were within a whisker if winning the 6n multiple times and, with the little extra bite brought in by Jones, went on to win back to back 6ns and set a winning streak record.Disagree with England
You know England won the 6N's literally before Lancaster came in right?He inherited a team that was in the news for poor behaviour and who were pretty poor. He took them to a side that were within a whisker if winning the 6n multiple times and, with the little extra bite brought in by Jones, went on to win back to back 6ns and set a winning streak record.
He wasn't the guy to achieve what Jones did but it was his team that Jones inherited. I doubt Jones could have done the same if he inherited the team Johnson left.
World cup embarrassment aside where he did **** the bed, the core of the team was definitely better than what it was when he started.
I think lancaster is proven at international level... world cup was poor yes, but had to integrate a superstar who never played the game on a years notice, and people are quick to forget how truly awful times were before lancaster and the relative highs lancaster had in comparision.I really don't want an Eddie Jones. I don't know how you got that from favouring Schmidt if I had the choice.
I hear you, but I think it's all a bit too big for one person at this point. They need a DOR separate to the head coach role.
Lancasters trajectory has reminded me a bit of Andy Robinson post England post. I just don't think he's the right man at the right time, that's no disrespect to him.
I would want someone proven recently at international level as head coach of the first team and to manage the interplay with the pro clubs better. The issues at age grade, the club game and the development pathways can be picked up by someone with their input.