- Joined
- Nov 5, 2017
- Messages
- 3,537
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Thanks.nah it's halfback . but yes.
the original post also has the allocations now
This is a cool idea, fairplay for organising it.
Thanks.nah it's halfback . but yes.
the original post also has the allocations now
nah it's halfback . but yes.Just to clarify, that's scrumhalf/9, right?
Thanks for taking the effort, happy with my position.
How exactly is this going to work, are we each going to make a subjective call and announce our player of the tournament at the end?
What does the 17 game number signify? Just getting a look in at every team?
For my part whenever I watch a game I'll update this thread with my thoughts on the 12s.
Edit: If someone is particularly keen on taking 12 I'm willing to swap, I don't want wings though.
To be fair it's probably a good thing I didn't get 13, Garry could have gotten injured before the tournament and not played and I'd still have picked him.I'm also willing to swap my 11, for any position.
nah it's halfback . but yes.
the original post also has the allocations now
Yes, each of us gets to be the sole judge of our position, to be announced at the end of the tournament. It allows you to have one eye on that player, likely providing a better assessment than what people would see if they tried to rank all positions.
Absolutely will be interesting to post any assessments/thoughts you are having as you go.
17 was just a pretty random number that felt like a reasonable amount of games to watch to qualify as a selector.
are you rubbing his nose in the fact he can't select ringrose?
Ok bud, I'm all over it!alright, I'll assign members to positions now. and get peoples confrimations that they're still in; it wasn't clear with some people that they wanted to participate, or just wanted to state that they will watch lots of games, or just wanted to promote gary ringrose.
I suppose it is OK to trade positions before the tournament starts. I mean if someone gets tighthead but they are a first five expert and the person that gets first five loves tightheads tehn by all measn swap. I don't want to dictate the rules though, so speak up if you disagree.
I'll be rolling dice to allocate positions. first role says which group of 1-5 (if i role 1-2), 6-10 (if i role 3-4), 11-15 (if i role 5-6), second role determines what number in that group of 5, where i'll re-roll if i roll a 6. Obviously i'll reroll if i get a position already allocated.
@bushytop
i rolled a 4, then a 1. you get number 6. For clarity to South Africans, this is blindside flanker
@TRF_heineken
i rolled a 2, then a 2. you get hooker.
@Leinster Fan
i rolled a 3, then a 4. you get halfback.
@The Alpha Bro
i rolled a 1, then a 6, then a 6, then a 1. you get loosehead prop.
@TRF_Olyy
i rolled a 2, then a 1 (already taken), then a 4. you get number 4, lock. I'm proposing here you select from players wearing the number 4. unless you want to determine a better method with the member who gets allocated 5.
@TommiG88
i rolled a 2, then a 4, then a 6, then a 4, then a 2, then a 5. you get number 5, lock. see comment above.
@Rinkadink
i rolled a 4, then a 1, then a 1, then a 5. you get 10, first five eighth/ flyhalf/outside half.
**** now i found a 15 sided dice roller online, I'm switching to that*****
@ragerancher
i rolled a 2, then a 3. You get tighthead prop.
@themole25
i rolled a 1, 3, 10, 7. you get openside flanker.
@duncanb
i rolled 15. you get fullback
@Gena_ZA
i rolled a 4, 4, 7, 2, 14. you get 14, right wing.
@Cruz_del_Sur
i rolled a 13. you get centre/outside centre.
@SomeOke
i rolled 15, 9, 3, 6, 14, 1, 14, 10, 12. you get second five eighth / inside centre.
@BobbyM
i rolled 13, 5, 8. you get number 8.
@Umaga's Witness
you get 11, left wing.
Take mine, loose head. I won't be able to watch the group stages as much as I'd like apart from this weekend really.I just resigned and am heading to London at the start of November. The result of this is that I will have nothing to do for most of October so will be able to catch most of the games. Let me know if there are any positions available.
I just resigned and am heading to London at the start of November. The result of this is that I will have nothing to do for most of October so will be able to catch most of the games. Let me know if there are any positions available.
respect the sacrifice. Saulan, you are in.Take mine, loose head. I won't be able to watch the group stages as much as I'd like apart from this weekend really.
@Umaga's Witness
If you are keen to join pick a reserve position and I'll add you in.I'm going to try watch every game although I know that there's going to a be few of the T2 teams matches where I probably just up seeing the highlights.
If you are keen to join pick a reserve position and I'll add you in.
Depending on my work load I may have gracefully bow out - got a couple of deadlines coming up at work which might impact my sneakily-watching-the-games ability
We'll see though
If you are serious that would be awesome, you could take the opportunity to invent better stats than are currently in existence. For example, anything that has a subjective component is never a stat partly because different recorders will record different things. But some things, if you are the only recorder, you may be able to achieve a consistent viewpoint over time.Pfft, all these part time rugby fans
I'll be recording all games and watching them back just so I can record all the stats I think are relevant for an 8.
This is exactly what I'm aiming to do. Have broken down the stats into categories of open field, breakdown and set piece for both offence and defence, plus an error category and discipline category. Within each of these categories there are a range of stats (e.g. %of offensive rucks hit which result in ball retained). Loving the suggestions above too on contributing to turnovers!If you are serious that would be awesome, you could take the opportunity to invent better stats than are currently in existence. For example, anything that has a subjective component is never a stat partly because different recorders will record different things. But some things, if you are the only recorder, you may be able to achieve a consistent viewpoint over time.
Examples:
Effective ruck clearance. A clearance providing quick ball.
Dominant tackle
Wrong decision
Effective ruck clearance in second phase after getting over the advantage line. This is score time territory. A lot of tries come down to how well this is done.
Achieving a turnover. Could be by holding someone up, crating a maul; tipping the ball; clean steal; winning a penalty; driving the ruck back over the ball
Contributing to a turnover. When things above are caused by more than one player. Or when a player tackles the opposition behind the advantage line, bringing them to the ground quickly, to allow a teammate to come in and fetch the ball.
....
You may also want to consider the role the player has in the team, because not every 8 role is the same. Billy v is a ball carrier whereas pocock has a large fetching role, for instance. Point being a player might contribute highly to the team's effectiveness without looking like the typical 8.
A tricky but fascinating task. think you have to weight depending on opposition and importance but in a way that ensures players from teams that don't make the quarters still have equal chance. For them the toughest pool games that they have a chance of winning might be their important games.This is exactly what I'm aiming to do. Have broken down the stats into categories of open field, breakdown and set piece for both offence and defence, plus an error category and discipline category. Within each of these categories there are a range of stats (e.g. %of offensive rucks hit which result in ball retained). Loving the suggestions above too on contributing to turnovers!
There's a few things I'm still not sure about. First one, and this may sound silly, is measuring the decision making element of what 8's do. So for example where a team concedes a turnover a turnover partly because an 8 chose not to hit the ruck, or a try isn't scored because he didn't play the pass. Not sure there's a way around it so will have a comments column for that kind of thing.
Another thing I'm still considering is the extent to which one applies weighting to different stats. As you mention above different 8s contribute in different ways. I'm hoping with the volume of stats that one could do an 8v8 comparison, but I'm not sure it'll come out that clear cut.
Last thing that is tbc is do I factor in who the opponent is? So a big stat game against the ABs being "worth" more than a big game against Namibia, or not applying such a weighting? I think it's goibg to be a case of the games I'm passionate about (NZ and Scotland) I'll prob watch as a fan then rewatch for analysis, the others I'll try to do on first watch.
... would be good to confirm your participation or not so we can try and get a replacement in prior to the first game....Depending on my work load I may have gracefully bow out - got a couple of deadlines coming up at work which might impact my sneakily-watching-the-games ability
We'll see though
All good. It won't be all that hard to watch all the games from nz. The earliest ones start after 5 pm and the latest ones finish before 1am.Yeah, I think I'm gonna have to bow out unfortunately - I'm not even sure I'm going to be able to watch the opening game so it's not the best start