Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TRF_stormer2010" data-source="post: 541563" data-attributes="member: 39190">Good enough signings for the Kings if you look at who they already have there though I don&#039;t understand them; flank and scrumhalf is (along with lock arguably) perhaps the two positions where we have a wealth of good players and regularly produce world XV candidates. Why not go local in those positions, Kings?Particularly if you take into account that the premise for bringing th Kings in ahead of a far superior Lions outfit who is a young team in development was to develop local talent??? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite12" alt="o_O" title="Er... what?&nbsp; &nbsp; o_O" loading="lazy" data-shortname="o_O" />Add to that the fact that flank, prop and scrumhalf and particularly wing are the positions that you might find qualtiy ethnic black players and it makes even less sense. That said it&#039;s hardly surprising taking into account the way the whole thing has played out already.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TRF_stormer2010, post: 541563, member: 39190"] Good enough signings for the Kings if you look at who they already have there though I don't understand them; flank and scrumhalf is (along with lock arguably) perhaps the two positions where we have a wealth of good players and regularly produce world XV candidates. Why not go local in those positions, Kings? Particularly if you take into account that the premise for bringing th Kings in ahead of a far superior Lions outfit who is a young team in development was to develop local talent??? o.O Add to that the fact that flank, prop and scrumhalf and particularly wing are the positions that you might find qualtiy ethnic black players and it makes even less sense. That said it's hardly surprising taking into account the way the whole thing has played out already. [/QUOTE]

Verification