M
monkeypigeon
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Logorrhea @ Jun 4 2009, 01:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Ferris beat a winger over a longer distance....
Anyway, yeah! They're all awesome. I love the Geech interview where he says he told Croft when he was called up that he wouldn't be allowed to arse around on the wing like he does for Leicester and that's why he was nackered after 60 . Seriously though, Croft was class yesterday and I was complaining that he wasn't starting all through the 6N go back and check if you wish.
But he can't clear a ruck like Ferris and he doesn't have that much speed over him.
It's a win/win whoever we pick.
And can we stop talking about Croft beating the wing yesterday, Croft was going forward, the wing had to stop adn turn so over a short distance Ross Ford would have done the same.
Jesus were all get excited arent we.
Ferris has nowhere near the same pace as Spies or Croft, but he hits a **** lot harder. I'll take the hard hitter thank you, leave the namby pambying to the flowers out in the backs.
Croft on the other hand, for a second row / blind side is lightning fast. He left a S14 winger for dead last night.
I dont understand what the big deal about Spies is about really, he aint Lomu. He runs, he'll get tackled. Its not as if the Lions are going to tackle like a Super 14 team.[/b]
Ferris beat a winger over a longer distance....
Anyway, yeah! They're all awesome. I love the Geech interview where he says he told Croft when he was called up that he wouldn't be allowed to arse around on the wing like he does for Leicester and that's why he was nackered after 60 . Seriously though, Croft was class yesterday and I was complaining that he wasn't starting all through the 6N go back and check if you wish.
But he can't clear a ruck like Ferris and he doesn't have that much speed over him.
It's a win/win whoever we pick.
And can we stop talking about Croft beating the wing yesterday, Croft was going forward, the wing had to stop adn turn so over a short distance Ross Ford would have done the same.