- Joined
- Nov 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,606
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Following the injury to Jack Willis and debate about 3G pitches that it has thrown up, I thought it would be a good idea to create a catch all thread for debate on the topic and as a place to collate information / opinion about them and to avoid the ESP thread getting too many more off topic posts.
I was amazed over the weekend by the number of people staunchly defending these surfaces in reply to a slightly over the top from Brendan Gallagher, although on further inspection, they appeared to come from the kind of people who would defend any choice made by their club come what may or are so blinded by their loyalty they lose any sense of reason.
Having kept an eye out for anything relating to 3G pitch safety for a few years, I've seen complaints ranging from photos of abrasions, players avoiding games on these surfaces, a report stating that injuries are more common on these surfaces and even a possible link between AGPs and cancer, I'm amazed that anybody thinks that there's no need for further investigation. That's not to say that they're the root of all evil or even any worse than grass, just that further investigation is needed and that IMO, the burden should be to prove that they are safe, not that they are dangerous.
I'm hopeful that this become a hobby horse among some rugby journalists (there's plenty who love having a drum to beat) which will lead to further investigation. Sadly, given that the RFU are invested in AGPs and that it would in all likelihood be based upon data provided by clubs with a vested interest, it will be tough to rely on any report involving either.
I was amazed over the weekend by the number of people staunchly defending these surfaces in reply to a slightly over the top from Brendan Gallagher, although on further inspection, they appeared to come from the kind of people who would defend any choice made by their club come what may or are so blinded by their loyalty they lose any sense of reason.
Having kept an eye out for anything relating to 3G pitch safety for a few years, I've seen complaints ranging from photos of abrasions, players avoiding games on these surfaces, a report stating that injuries are more common on these surfaces and even a possible link between AGPs and cancer, I'm amazed that anybody thinks that there's no need for further investigation. That's not to say that they're the root of all evil or even any worse than grass, just that further investigation is needed and that IMO, the burden should be to prove that they are safe, not that they are dangerous.
I'm hopeful that this become a hobby horse among some rugby journalists (there's plenty who love having a drum to beat) which will lead to further investigation. Sadly, given that the RFU are invested in AGPs and that it would in all likelihood be based upon data provided by clubs with a vested interest, it will be tough to rely on any report involving either.