- Joined
- May 25, 2007
- Messages
- 5,708
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Posted this in another thread
[TEXTAREA]#1 plays the lowest ranked of the winning qualifiers
#2 plays the highest ranked of the winning qualifiers
so in the semis
Chiefs can play any team except the Brumbies
Bulls can play any team except the Cheetahs
Here are the four possible permutations
No 1: Brumbies & Crusaders win
Chiefs v Crusaders
Bulls v Brumbies
No 2: Brumbies and Reds win
Chiefs v Reds
Bulls v Brumbies
No 3: Crusaders and Cheetahs win
Chiefs v Cheetahs
Bulls v Crusaders
No 4: Reds and Cheetahs win
Chiefs v Cheetahs
Bulls v Reds[/TEXTAREA]
I still think the system they are using is wrong. Winning your conference should not guarantee you a top 3 spot, it should only guarantee a playoff spot.
The seedings should then be worked out on table rankings alone.
[TEXTAREA]#1 plays the lowest ranked of the winning qualifiers
#2 plays the highest ranked of the winning qualifiers
so in the semis
Chiefs can play any team except the Brumbies
Bulls can play any team except the Cheetahs
Here are the four possible permutations
No 1: Brumbies & Crusaders win
Chiefs v Crusaders
Bulls v Brumbies
No 2: Brumbies and Reds win
Chiefs v Reds
Bulls v Brumbies
No 3: Crusaders and Cheetahs win
Chiefs v Cheetahs
Bulls v Crusaders
No 4: Reds and Cheetahs win
Chiefs v Cheetahs
Bulls v Reds[/TEXTAREA]
I still think the system they are using is wrong. Winning your conference should not guarantee you a top 3 spot, it should only guarantee a playoff spot.
The seedings should then be worked out on table rankings alone.