Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Archived
Tri Nations 2009-2011
South Africa v New Zealand. 21 Aug 2010. What is your prediction?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Logorrhea" data-source="post: 338534" data-attributes="member: 43061"><p>Ooooooooo and a member of Hamshires Rugby Union Referees Society no less. How could I possibly argue with somene who claims to be in a referees society. He must be a dude amongst dudes. </p><p> </p><p></p><p>I swear I nearly peed a little when I saw that. Class stuff.</p><p> </p><p>Anyway, exactly which bits were false? The one about using makey uppy statistics, which you didnt seem to argue with, or the one where you pretended people were talking about Juan Smiths shove when they actually werent. </p><p> </p><p>For example in your most recent post where you called me a liar (the drama was absolutely brilliant), you stated there are 23 posters in that topic. Creating an impression that 23 people were discussing Juan Smiths shove (a lively discussion that was about 50/50 for a citing). </p><p> </p><p>The reality as we both know is that there were 23 posters (I didnt actually count) but about 4 of them briefly talked about the citing, the rest were talking about McCaws try, Spear tackling and Positioning. </p><p> </p><p>Its another missrepresentation of the facts. You did the same in another discussion of the laws not to long ago. You seem to do it quite a lot actually. I cant be the only person who has called you on it, can I? </p><p> </p><p>Either way, I'll report myself for the laugh. </p><p> </p><p></p><p>To my dissapointment it looks as it your right. Interesting all the same.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Logorrhea, post: 338534, member: 43061"] Ooooooooo and a member of Hamshires Rugby Union Referees Society no less. How could I possibly argue with somene who claims to be in a referees society. He must be a dude amongst dudes. I swear I nearly peed a little when I saw that. Class stuff. Anyway, exactly which bits were false? The one about using makey uppy statistics, which you didnt seem to argue with, or the one where you pretended people were talking about Juan Smiths shove when they actually werent. For example in your most recent post where you called me a liar (the drama was absolutely brilliant), you stated there are 23 posters in that topic. Creating an impression that 23 people were discussing Juan Smiths shove (a lively discussion that was about 50/50 for a citing). The reality as we both know is that there were 23 posters (I didnt actually count) but about 4 of them briefly talked about the citing, the rest were talking about McCaws try, Spear tackling and Positioning. Its another missrepresentation of the facts. You did the same in another discussion of the laws not to long ago. You seem to do it quite a lot actually. I cant be the only person who has called you on it, can I? Either way, I'll report myself for the laugh. To my dissapointment it looks as it your right. Interesting all the same. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Archived
Tri Nations 2009-2011
South Africa v New Zealand. 21 Aug 2010. What is your prediction?
Top