- Joined
- Dec 3, 2012
- Messages
- 2,979
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Yeah, I'm probably just imagining it. I'm half asleep, still in bed posting these things. I might just be having nightmares about the boks againImagine that...
Yeah, I'm probably just imagining it. I'm half asleep, still in bed posting these things. I might just be having nightmares about the boks againImagine that...
Yeah, I'm probably just imagining it. I'm half asleep, still in bed posting these things. I might just be having nightmares about the boks again
Last time I posted my world cup predictions I had wales as second favourite, and there has been no internationals since then yet i seem to have changed my mind. Or have i? All i did was post my most likely scenario out of all the possibilities. And id probably put a less than 10% chance of it playing out that way. Maybe after going through all the scenarios and assigning probabilities wales would still come out second, or even first. I would guess the all blacks would beat wales, and the springboks would beat them, but no other team.
Yes I think wales is one dimensional, but I'm not blind to the fact it's working. Full kudos deserved. My favourite thi g about rugby is that different styles can be competitive agaunst each other.
Last time I posted my world cup predictions I had wales as second favourite, and there has been no internationals since then yet i seem to have changed my mind. Or have i? All i did was post my most likely scenario out of all the possibilities. And id probably put a less than 10% chance of it playing out that way. Maybe after going through all the scenarios and assigning probabilities wales would still come out second, or even first. I would guess the all blacks would beat wales, and the springboks would beat them, but no other team.
Yes I think wales is one dimensional, but I'm not blind to the fact it's working. Full kudos deserved. My favourite thi g about rugby is that different styles can be competitive agaunst each other.
Fair call, deffo the defence, I was meaning more as a means of getting points you rely on ball retention. Best defence in the world for sure. Most critics misunderstand the kicking game too, accusing your halfbacks of failing in their kicks because they are incontestable. In reality they are kicking it a bit deeper so they have a solid defensive line, can't be beaten one on one. Gives more territory too. It's exactly how the highlanders a few years ago and often the all blacks, who tend to kick more than anyone, operate.I think there's some truth in the one-dimensional bit, but it's not through ball retention (that's more Ireland's gig). Our defense is what's doing it, and sometimes that results in us winning games despite having less than 40% possession! There is serious attacking potential in our ranks as well though, we just aren't seeing it consistently enough. I think this will be the most important factor, if we can up our attacking game by 10%, giving the likes of Tipuric, Sanjay, North and JD2 space to operate then we may actually have a shot of lifting the trophy (not forgetting Gareth Davies, Anscombe and Adams who are all offensive orientated players). If we continue to rely on defense then I can see us coming a cropper in one of the knockout games (and potentially vs Aus in the pool stages).
If we have to face NZ at any stage that'll be a huge ask as well. I don't think NZ are anywhere near their previous, almost unbeatable, best; but Wales haven't beaten them for more than 60 years! I suppose it's gotta happen sometime, but in a WC knockout/final, that feels too much to ask.
Overall I think it'll be one of NZ, SA, Eng, Ire or Wal; with the easy money being on NZ (who may yet up it during the WC and become untouchable).
Super rugby form doesn't usually count for a lot. In 1998 nz had 3 teams in the semis and maybe a fourth team just missed the cut. That was the all blacks worst year in history (based on results against two great teams so it was hardly that bad, but still).Well I don't know what to read into it if we look at what's happening in the Super Rugby currently, but there are some signs that the NZ teams have frailties in certain positions, and there are things to exploit, and whether this will be carried through to the All Blacks remains to be seen. But I think NZ have a problem at the props and at lock. Other teams have been able to turnover set phase ball from the NZ teams easier than before, and some NZ teams have also stuggled with the Scrums.
But with that said, my fear is that the SA teams are performing remarkably well, and I fear that this might not be carried over to the Springboks...
Super rugby form doesn't usually count for a lot. In 1998 nz had 3 teams in the semis and maybe a fourth team just missed the cut. That was the all blacks worst year in history (based on results against two great teams so it was hardly that bad, but still).
The nz teams are seriously lacking in coaching quality at the moment, and now everyone has caught up and is playing the offloading game we started a few years back. I also think we don't have huge depth but if we don't have many injuries we'll still be competitive.
Tyrel Lomax and Owen franks have been quality tight heads. Hopefully we don't need more. Karl played poorly in his last one or two games but I'm wondering if he was nursing an injury or sickness. Joe moody is solid. The crusaders have been defeated by smart scrum tactics by the sa teams, but the all blacks will likely analyse the heck out of that.
At lock we have Whitelock, retallick, and Barrett. We just don't want any injuries because there is a big gap before the next best.
I think the Boks are just as fragile tbh. Both the all blacks and Boks are vulnerable to injuries to key players. Boks with no faf, or vermeulen, Le roux. All blacks with no smith or Ardie (and they'll probably not even pick him). Etc.
England beat Australia in qf1
New Zealand beat Scotland in qf2
Wales beat Argentina in qf3
South Africa beat Ireland in qf4
New Zealand beat england in sf1
South Africa beat wales in sf2
South Africa beat new Zealand in final
Hope I'm wrong
If the Super Rugby is anything to go by I think Argentina is going to have a big World Cup , I really hope we get a Crusader vs Jaguars final in Super Rugby this year !
I think all of these teams can win the world cup :
All Blacks
Ireland
England
Argentina
South Africa
Australia
Going out on a limp here and give the Argies 40% chance of winning the World Cup based on super rugby form .
If this thread is anything to go by, Super Rugby form during a World Cup year doesn't seem to indicate much (apart from failure).
Still, the Argies always turn up at World Cups so you could be right.
Not that I'm trying to revisit your bed-Boks or anything but...