B
Black-Monday
Guest
I did a bit of research into the Chiefs team when I making a roster for Rugby 06, I noticed they never picked Hill, how come? Isn't he meant to be quite good?
BM
BM
-
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
W
Wally
Guest
B
Black-Monday
Guest
What is that meant to mean?Originally posted by Wally@May 8 2006, 01:04 AM
BM
Q
QKXV
Guest
the way the crusaders put the bulls off their game and completely outplayed them in every aspect of the match would make me think the same as Sambad but I hope the Canes throw a bit of a spanner in the works.
CHiefs played brilliantly though, I needed to see a proper game of rugby after the more or less one sided affair at loftus and this game proved to be it :bravo:
K
kaftka
Guest
Who knows?Originally posted by Black-Monday+May 8 2006, 03:09 AM-->What is that meant to mean?@May 8 2006, 01:04 AM
BM [/b]
Hill is the man. Some coaches are dumbarses. Remember that guy who persisted in playing that Lavea dude? Count Whatsisface?
J
-JJ-
Guest
Hill is far better than Donald. It puzzled me, and most of the Waikato Stadium crowd I think as to why Donald started so many games. I mean Hill was injured for a little while but he came back and was on the bench for many weeks.
Chiefs could have an extremely good backline if they put it together right...
Twould be quite good if Tuitupou sees the light and follows in Lauakis footsteps in moving to Waikato for the rest of his playing days in NZ
Kelleher
Hill
Sivivatu
Tuitupou
Muliaina
Anesi
Chricton (sp?)
Bring back Glen(n?) Jackson too.
Chiefs could have an extremely good backline if they put it together right...
Twould be quite good if Tuitupou sees the light and follows in Lauakis footsteps in moving to Waikato for the rest of his playing days in NZ
Kelleher
Hill
Sivivatu
Tuitupou
Muliaina
Anesi
Chricton (sp?)
Bring back Glen(n?) Jackson too.
