Being a great 10 =/= being an amazing goal kicker.
If the rest of their game is top notch, and there's someone else on the team who can kick, who cares?
Spot on.
Being a great 10 =/= being an amazing goal kicker.
If the rest of their game is top notch, and there's someone else on the team who can kick, who cares?
Terry Holmes used to kick for Wales. Does that take away from the outside half playing at the time?
I'm personally of an opinion that having the kicking duties fall on a player with less pressure on him already makes sense. The outside half already has the pressure of controlling the game, making the decision of when to pass, run or kick etc. There is less pressure on the rest of the backline. If a winger can kick like Halfpenny it makes sense to me to hand him the kicking duties. Some outside halves gain confidence from their kicking, thus propelling the rest of their game, but some don't, and imo Priestland falls into the second category. He's a confidence kicker, but tis aspect of his game has never influenced the rest of his game.
Spread the responsibilities. Anyone know why it always seems to be the 10 who kicks (apart from in France where the 9 is usually the kicker)? It's never been clear to me. If all players practised their goal kicking from a young age, then maybe more wingers, centres, fullbacks, or even some forwards whould have the kicking duties. As it is, I suppose only the outside half practises kicking in youth/amateur level.
Don't ever recall Holmes kicking for goal with either Cardiff, Wales or the Lions.