Like referees, maybe we should use some filming team that have nothing to do with the countries involved ?? As Video refering is becoming important ??
Yep. American NFL television crews. Is that OK?
Like referees, maybe we should use some filming team that have nothing to do with the countries involved ?? As Video refering is becoming important ??
And the strength, the premeditation, the precise targeting put in the move ?? Absolutely not the same...
Okay, I keep hearing this story about a finger, that is purely a rumour and a wrong one. From the screenshots you can clearly see Pape has grabbed his side, nowhere near his shorts.View attachment 4026
This screenshot has been floating around twitter this morning... I'm not sure that I buy it as a line of defence though.
This screenshot has been floating around twitter this morning... I'm not sure that I buy it as a line of defence though.
A strike to the stomach with a half clenched fist from a standing position is probably at least ten times less serious than a strike with the knee to the back with a running start breaking the player's back. Those two incidents are incomparable.For those who talk about 1 week ban, I would like to remind everybody why the french are thinking these bans have always been heavier for their players : Pape had a 10 weeks ban for what he has done to Heaslip, just as a reminder.
I'm ready to believe that Pape behaviour was maybe a bit nastier (though he has insisted after that he has not made it on purpose with french media..I do not really believe it but still...) because coming in the back of heaslip... but 1 to 10 weeks ????
It is like we know already that the sanction will be softer for an irish man, it is already a given, we are used to it as frenchies.
A strike to the stomach with a half clenched fist from a standing position is probably at least ten times less serious than a strike with the knee to the back with a running start breaking the player's back. Those two incidents are incomparable.
If O'Brien was a professional heavyweight boxer he may have managed to injure Pape for the match. Pape could have paralysed Heaslip... I wouldn't call anyone, in a one off case, striking a player 'dirty scum'. Anyone who has played rugby for a significant period of time has thrown a punch in anger.I do not agree but I guess it is all about bias in this case. Again, think about what you would have said if Pape would have punched SOB the same way, you would be asking for terminating his world cup at least and calling him "Dirty scum". The knee impact onHheaslip was not that high speed even if nasty certainly. SOB could have hurt Pape also much more as well.
For those who talk about 1 week ban, I would like to remind everybody why the french are thinking these bans have always been heavier for their players : Pape had a 10 weeks ban for what he has done to Heaslip, just as a reminder.
I'm ready to believe that Pape behaviour was maybe a bit nastier (though he has insisted after that he has not made it on purpose with french media..I do not really believe it but still...) because coming in the back of heaslip... but 1 to 10 weeks ????
It is like we know already that the sanction will be softer for an irish man, it is already a given, we are used to it as frenchies.
There is Nastiness in the 2 intentions in my own perspective.
I do not think that Pape wanted to target any vertebrae.
Kneeing someone in the back after running at them from a distance has far more potential for injury than a punch to the stomach. Come on now.