Here is the planned review for SA Rugby
http://www.sapeople.com/2016/11/26/south-african-rugby-plans-springbok-review-governance/
Mark Alexander said plans to bring governance structures more in line with the demands of professional sport were already well advanced while the immediate question of what to do about Springbok results was the organisation’s No 1 priority.
"We must coolly and coldly analyse what have been the main factors contributing to those results before determining what remedies are at our disposal to solve them. We will start by speaking to the coach and other team role players for their assessment and to provide our feedback. We will take feedback from forthcoming workshops and we must critically review our selection policy relating to overseas-based players"
Mr Alexander confirmed that the planned on-field interventions would continue as scheduled.
Don't know about governance structures being well advanced other than governance seems to be politically driven. Remove the political rules, practices and processes - that will be a step in the right direction.
At least their no1 priority is what to do about the results - while it makes reference to possibly including overseas players which is perhaps a move in the right direction it is clear the planned on-field interventions which refers to quotas and targets is an area that is not up for negotiation. So referring back to governance it seems politics will continue to dominate.
A conditioning workshop for the national teams and Vodacom Super Rugby biokineticists would take place on 7 December.
The coaching workshop between the Springbok coaches and franchise coaches takes place on 12 December.
Meanwhile, a General Council meeting on 9 December could also have a significant bearing on the future of rugby in South Africa, Mr Alexander said.
“A number of constitutional changes are being placed before the unions for their consideration,†he said.
Mr Alexander said the key changes planned are:
1 - New franchise and non-franchise rugby committees to improve communication between unions and Executive Council; to make recommendations on competitions and playing affairs; and to speed up decision making.
Good!
2 - Allowing third parties to take a majority shareholding in Unions’ commercial arms and have a voice in running rugby through the new franchise rugby committee.
Adding a few more carriages to the gravy train.
3 - Doubling independent representation on the Executive Council to four members plus the representative of the players
Independents - smells of nepotism.
Players - tow the line or you're out.
4 - Terminating the role of the vice-president (at the end of the current term in 2018) to bring the elected representation to six
And this helps how?
The Executive Council is also planning the creation of an Advisory Board of eminent individuals from business and civic society to act as a sounding board for rugby. That body would not have a constitutional role however.
So a toothless body that will be disregarded if it's opinion is counter to the political agenda.
Seems the more things change the more they stay the same!