And a rank logo to boot
Adam Gilchrist, the shameless egomaniac owns Austin Gilgronis and also LA Giltinis. Can you imagine if he ran Major League Rugby? The logo would probably look something like this.
Last edited:
And a rank logo to boot
...that had to be a joke....that’s the most tacky name for a sports team I’ve ever heardAustin Gilgronis was the dumbest name ever for a rugby team...until this one came along.
http://www.americasrugbynews.com/20...ppd8FjDo0_NbRWUw__QEWvCDzTb0A8gQZOe_akrOiCQm0
![]()
...that had to be a joke....that’s the most tacky name for a sports team I’ve ever heard
I know things are a bit more lax in California but this is a new level of crazy
I live in southern California and heard on a Sports Report yesterday that the LA Giltinis plan on playing in the LA Coliseum which has a capacity of more than 78,000. It's going to look really odd when they have a crowd of 5,000 (if they're lucky) in that giant stadium pictured below. They should have worked out a deal to play at one/or both of the two pro soccer stadiums in the LA area. They hold 22,000 & 27,000 respectively and would be a much better fit for rugby. I hope playing in the LA Coliseum works out, but I have my doubts.
![]()
I don't think there is a rugby club in the world that could fill that. It'll be like watching Super Rugby and their empty stadiums, but worse
Our crew debated it on Rugby PickEm .... some people agree with the fact that it looks and sounds utterly ridiculous. But, and hear me out here ... , isn't the fact that he's injecting millions of dollars into a young, fledgling league somewhat of a good thing?Austin Gilgronis was the dumbest name ever for a rugby team...until this one came along.
http://www.americasrugbynews.com/20...ppd8FjDo0_NbRWUw__QEWvCDzTb0A8gQZOe_akrOiCQm0
![]()
on the surface and in the short term yes, its a good thing...but its not good for rugby in the US in general, a team with such a cringe worthy name will never attract the long term passionate fans, if you look at all the oldest sports teams or the ones known for the huge or passionate fan bases...none have stupid names...people just dont like saying "i bleed aqua and pink, i love those Giltini's"....in the end they will both fail and be re brandedOur crew debated it on Rugby PickEm .... some people agree with the fact that it looks and sounds utterly ridiculous. But, and hear me out here ... , isn't the fact that he's injecting millions of dollars into a young, fledgling league somewhat of a good thing?
We're entering a recession, and Gilchrist's $ is as green as anyone else's. PRO Rugby failed because Doug Schoninger's bank account was peanuts (and many other reasons). Should we just accept the "ego money" and embrace it the upside it can bring? Just a thought.
http://www.rugbypickem.com/2020/06/the-giltinis-debate.html
on the surface and in the short term yes, its a good thing...but its not good for rugby in the US in general, a team with such a cringe worthy name will never attract the long term passionate fans, if you look at all the oldest sports teams or the ones known for the huge or passionate fan bases...none have stupid names...people just dont like saying "i bleed aqua and pink, i love those Giltini's"....in the end they will both fail and be re branded
also, logo i a martini glass...something you famously wont be able to buy on the terraces
Here's the first ever inaugural MLR collegiate draft broadcast from this past weekend. 400 players announced, but only 24 were chosen. Congratulations to them.
https://www.ftfnext.com/videos/1592...-R0pU_aBHfVkaiwsWi7LZdbTu0fs6o7kDEgTI-yKEz8L8
Will be exciting to see if any of these players, after their initial contract, move to europe or remain in the US and grow the game there that way
All that money in Europe is hard to turn down. Hopefully the MLR will keep growing and they'll have more revenue to entice the locally grown players to stay in the US. The MLR Commissioner recently stated that as many as five more new teams may join in the next couple of years bringing the total to 18.