Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Lions and Sharks flirting with pro14
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cruz_del_Sur" data-source="post: 871413" data-attributes="member: 55747"><p>You cannot be that naive. I refuse to believe you are that naive and have no understanding, whatsoever, about how PR and media teams work.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not true. Why do you lie?</p><p>I've came across the article in facebook, twitter and posted links to SARU rugby mag and times.co.uk.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Two points:</p><p></p><p>1) Since you would be accusing me of spamming, the burden of proof would lie with you. Not only that, but for it to constitute spam you would need to demonstrate:</p><p>a) intent from my part</p><p>b) that the news are actually fake</p><p></p><p>Good luck with that.</p><p>As you've said to other posters in the past: lawyered...</p><p></p><p>2)You just said what i did could be regarded as spam. If you think so, and given that you, as a mod, are here to enforce the forum rules, put your money where your mouth is.</p><p></p><p>Regarding the credibility, well, that's just ludicrous. I didn't come here and swore an oath to whatever times.co.uk or SARU rugby mag write. I picked up something from a source that looked reliable, found the info interesting and that was it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Fair enough. Edited original post (added a question mark) so the thin skinned like yourself don't get panic attacks or anything.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Good for you. You mentioned you are a lawyer, so i have to assume you are familiar with the concept of retroactivity and how that would invalidate actions towards this thread (lawyered part II).</p><p></p><p></p><p>Grasping straws there. You look desperate. Since you are talking about new rules, why don't you suggest anything posted related to the Cheetah's CEO should be deleted, and the poster banned. I mean, by your own logic, it'd be unreliable and spam.</p><p>Keep us posted about how that goes. I'm convinced that sort of suggestion would make you even more popular.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That's awfully kind of you, particularly when we all know it will be impossible to prove one way or another.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cruz_del_Sur, post: 871413, member: 55747"] You cannot be that naive. I refuse to believe you are that naive and have no understanding, whatsoever, about how PR and media teams work. Not true. Why do you lie? I've came across the article in facebook, twitter and posted links to SARU rugby mag and times.co.uk. Two points: 1) Since you would be accusing me of spamming, the burden of proof would lie with you. Not only that, but for it to constitute spam you would need to demonstrate: a) intent from my part b) that the news are actually fake Good luck with that. As you've said to other posters in the past: lawyered... 2)You just said what i did could be regarded as spam. If you think so, and given that you, as a mod, are here to enforce the forum rules, put your money where your mouth is. Regarding the credibility, well, that's just ludicrous. I didn't come here and swore an oath to whatever times.co.uk or SARU rugby mag write. I picked up something from a source that looked reliable, found the info interesting and that was it. Fair enough. Edited original post (added a question mark) so the thin skinned like yourself don't get panic attacks or anything. Good for you. You mentioned you are a lawyer, so i have to assume you are familiar with the concept of retroactivity and how that would invalidate actions towards this thread (lawyered part II). Grasping straws there. You look desperate. Since you are talking about new rules, why don't you suggest anything posted related to the Cheetah's CEO should be deleted, and the poster banned. I mean, by your own logic, it'd be unreliable and spam. Keep us posted about how that goes. I'm convinced that sort of suggestion would make you even more popular. That's awfully kind of you, particularly when we all know it will be impossible to prove one way or another. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Lions and Sharks flirting with pro14
Top