Int Ref's!!!!???

[Tank94]

almal van SA ons almal weet hirdie pisgesigte van new zeeland en al die ane lande ganie rerg saamstem oor die ref storie nie want hulle is die wat voorgetrek word terwyl ons an die agterste speen syg! my point is your blind if you think SD was consitant he was awfull, exa... hougaard was dissruped 2 times and he just looked away and acted as if nothing happend!!!! Die REFS is donerswil uselees

Ja, SD was regtig KAK maar jy sal nie enige iemand kry in die NH wat dit sal se nie. hulle dink seker Scotland het gewen omdat hulle die beter span was en dit is strond. Met n ander ref sou ons tien teen een gewen het.

 

[Seaton]

Ja, SD was regtig KAK maar jy sal nie enige iemand kry in die NH wat dit sal se nie. hulle dink seker Scotland het gewen omdat hulle die beter span was en dit is strond. Met n ander ref sou ons tien teen een gewen het.

Maar, soms mense van die NH kan verstaan jy.
Skotland was die beter span, wat was hoekom hulle die wedstryd gewen.

The ref was bad and incompetent, not biased. There were plenty of incidents he missed and called wrong for both sides, and supersport was hardly neutral in their after match analysis.
The commentators were naturally biased, after all they were commentating for mainly UK viewers. (not that anyone has mentioned the commentators up until this point)

The commentator summed it uup perfectly "Scotland have been bad, but that is just an indication of how much worse South Africa has been"

 

[gingergenius]

interesting, shows how closely related Afrikaans is to English that I can get the general sense of what you guys are saying.

 

[Tank94]

interesting, shows how closely related Afrikaans is to English that I can get the general sense of what you guys are saying.

its closely related to dutch and german languages

 

[Tank94]

Maar, soms mense van die NH kan verstaan jy.
Skotland was die beter span, wat was hoekom hulle die wedstryd gewen.

The ref was bad and incompetent, not biased. There were plenty of incidents he missed and called wrong for both sides, and supersport was hardly neutral in their after match analysis.
The commentators were naturally biased, after all they were commentating for mainly UK viewers. (not that anyone has mentioned the commentators up until this point)

The commentator summed it uup perfectly "Scotland have been bad, but that is just an indication of how much worse South Africa has been"

ek weet party van die mense van die NH kan Afrikaans verstaan maar scotland het nie eers een drie gedruk nie.

Scotland got all their points from dan parks.

do you really think they are the better team or just that they were a bit better on the day?

 

[Seaton]

ek weet party van die mense van die NH kan Afrikaans verstaan maar scotland het nie eers een drie gedruk nie.

Scotland got all their points from dan parks.

do you really think they are the better team or just that they were a bit better on the day?

Of course i don't think Scotland have the better team, I think that enters into mental asylum territory.

I would say the respective gameplans, or rather execution of game plans, was the deciding factor in the match

 

[Generaal]

Yes... "respective game plans"

The Bok game plan was:
"it's nice n wet... lets kick the ball away and give Scotland all the possession!!!"

- wtf's up with that? BAD coaching!!!

 

[Barberians15]

yes the ref did call a couple of bad calls
but
we played so bad and our tactics was stupid for kicking the ball away the hole time

even if we had a better ref i think we would still have lost