Bit of corroboration that Doussain has been called up: http://www.planetrugby.com/story/0,25883,9817_8221158,00.html
It was known that PSA would keep two 9's and two 10's, which imo is a waste given Michalak and Parra's (at a stretch) polyfunctionality............ Despite some crackheads over the french forums wanting to play Machenaud instead of Parra, I really don't see this happenning. We may see Michalak instead of TD though.
On Huget, I think that as most french fans don't follow every Bayonne game, his bad 6N in 2011 kind of stuck in people's heads for too long, and his suspension after that didn't help. I think that going back to Toulouse helped him a lot.
yeah (TONY MANX) the 9 and 10 thing...of course, it begs the comment: "oh how atypical", but surely PSA has smt planned out there, not just random...we'll see how that pans out, not sure what the point is really...hard to even think of one.
.
My point is that Michalak as a mercurial player should not be a starting pick (especially at 10) as he will probably give away as many points as he will make. If a game seems "lost" bring him on and lets see what he can do to rescue the situation as there is nothing to lose. If the games is "won" lets bring him on and let him entertain us with his unlimited talents! Please do not doubt that I think he is brilliant and is playing as well this season as I have seen him - but there is still the propensity of too many costly mistakes!
As for PSA has something planned.....with Lagisquet in the equation, I have to wonder!