M
melon
Guest
I don't think that England should be in the wall of fame. I mean they have gone downhill since the world cup and this has shown in their results.
England traditionally play "boring" ten-man rugby but then that has always been their strength and has suited the weather conditions that they normally play in. The "boring" rugby is fine when they are winning but opens them up to criticism when they stop winning.
But to say England should be in the hall of fame is a bit weak.
I can see how someone could blame the coach, or the selectors or even both. I can also see how some people could blame certain players although this always comes back to the coach for selecting them instead of dropping them.
England have been crap since they won the world cup in '03. The reason that they have been crap since then is easy - the coach - England have the players to be competitive against anyone at anytime they have just not selected the right personel or tactics.
And this comes down to the coach.
Don't blame England blame the coach.
He's crap![/b]
Are u brain dead? Look at the forum name: Wall of Shame NOT Wall of Fame