<div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'>
I'd put down £5 that Rocket Joe and Habana would skin him on grass.
On a rubber running track in his plimpsoles he'd easily muller them, but I dunno about in the real world wearing studs.
Plus, I'll wager he's not got the stamina for 40 minutes at a time.
[/b]
Mug. Olympic quality athletes are much fitter than rugby players, the one thing that he won't be concerned about is stamina.
----
If you measure speed over 100m or even 60m then Chambers will be the fastest man ever to have played rugby seriously.
However, rugby isn't about running quickly over 100m. It's about the 20m speed, at most 40m. That's why American footballers do a '40 yard dash' because speed over an extremely short distance is the most relevant. Over 100m the likes of Jason Robinson and Shane Williams would be relatively slow. Over 20 I wouldn't be surprised if (in their primes) they beat Habana and Chavhanga.
So, in terms of potential top speed Chambers is the fastest. Whether he's that amazing over 20m remains to be seen.
[/b][/quote]
I doub't whether Chambers will have the stamina, he doesn't like that, he only works on his fast twitch muscle, and not his slow twitch, which is needed for endurance. [/b][/quote]
Plus, track and field athletes can only run at 100% once or twice in a training day. Usually they train at 60 70%. So deffo no stamina at all I think.
[/b][/quote]
Apart from the fact that even if you're a sprinter you'll be doing a lot of running and gym work aside from the sprinting. The same if you've been training for American Football.