best_fullback
Academy Player
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2006
- Messages
- 375
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
I don't consider it "fair and square" if the bigger guy has a significant height or weight advantage!!
What does "fair and square" even mean?? Is it some retarded throw back to bygone days of men rolling their sleeves up and having a good clean punch up to solve their quarrels...lol.
If you try and fight someone who is significantly bigger and taller you're basically asking for trouble. They made their bed so they have to lie in it. There is no such thing as fair and square in a fight, someone will always have some sort of advantage in some way, as will the other - but this is completely missing the point. In principle if you start on someone then you deserve everything you get (albeit within reason). If you run up to someone and smash them in the face with a bottle that is the definition of cowardice. In your earlier post you state:
What i don't get is how so many on here think it's perfectly acceptable for a 15 stone rugby player to knock **** out of a far smaller guy yet it's not acceptable for said guy to lift a bottle to even the playing field!! ??
The use of weapons is not an 'even playing field'. Im sure pretty much everyone on here would say that the use of a weapon in a fight is unfair. Although I have never really been in a proper fight I still can appreciate that if I attacked someone, they retailiated and then later in the night I ran up to them and broke their leg with an iron bar that it would be completely unfair.