I guess I like the 1960's look of the hairstyle, but then, who's looking at the hairstyle?
IMO, the slow engagement is a big contributing factor in the mess at scrum-time. This is not Rolland's fault, its IRB policy, made up by some dumb-fvck who has never packed in the front row of a scrum in his life.
I have never been a fan of the four-step engagement sequence. Why on earth is there a pause, before you say pause, and another pause after you say pause?
effectively, what they are doing is
"CROUCH" --
pause -- "TOUCH" --
pause -- "PAUSE" --
pause -- "ENGAGE"
What they should be doing is have the -- pause -- as an unspoken action between the TOUCH and the ENGAGE. so
"CROUCH" -- pause -- "TOUCH" -- pause -- "ENGAGE" ("engage being a two syllable word, the "en" becomes the warning and the front rows come together on the "gage")
This makes much more sense to me than the shamozzle we have at the moment