- Joined
- Sep 17, 2009
- Messages
- 16,160
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
I'm only saying they are options been explored nothing concrete or certain only Munster officals are meeting IRFU and Ross this morning
Shame. Musgrave Park is a kip and badly needs to be redeveloped.Downturn halts Munster's Musgrave Park stand plans
By Barry Coughlan
Friday, February 18, 2011
THE economic downturn has forced the Munster Branch of the IRFU to postpone plans for a new state-of-the-art 6,500 capacity stand at Musgrave Park.
Instead, the Branch is to seek Cork City Council approval to install a temporary 4,000-seat structure to meet competition requirements until such time as it can raise the necessary funds needed to go ahead with original plans.
Munster, through its development committee, had hoped to raise sufficient funds through the sales of up to 1,000 seven-year ticket packages to allow work start on the original structure, but in the current climate there appears to be resistance in the market to spending between €2,500 to €4,000 (three categories) on rugby tickets.
Development committee chairman Niall O'Driscoll, a former president of the Branch, explained: "It's a difficult time, you're not going to get finance from banks and you're not going to get support from the IRFU to support borrowings from banks in the current economic climate.
"Therefore, we've got to go out to get packages of tickets sold to bring more money on the table. We do have funding but we need more and as much as we possibly can before the finance committee will allow the original development to go ahead."
He explained the necessity to maximise revenue from Magners League games in Cork, and pointed out that the current stand catered for only 430 people that produced little or no revenue.
"To participate in Magners League rugby you've got to provide seated accommodation, so as an interim measure the plan is for a temporary stand to go in there for probably a 12 month period, installed sometime around June or July."
The structure would, he said, be self-financing in that seated accommodation generates considerably more income than terrace tickets and the investment would be very modest compared to the €6m-€7m needed to provide the permanent structure.
Mr O'Driscoll insisted the development committee would plough ahead with fund-raising plans in a bid to put more money on the table but he expects now that tenders for the original stand would probably not need to go out for about six more months; however, the Branch is conscious that the project will have to move ahead within the time frame allowed by the planning laws.
A 4,000-seater stand will bring the capacity of Musgrave Park to 10,000 — still 2,500 short of their medium term goal. Munster's long term plans include development of the other side of the ground with a similarly sized 6,000-seater structure and enhanced terracing that would eventually bring the capacity of the ground close to 20,000.
Snoop that is simply money needed elsewhere. I agree Musgrave Park is a Kip and in an awful location. But we have 1 state of the art facility and while work is needed in Musgrave it isn't a neccessity. We need to fix team and keep competitive so fans will keep coming. Then I'm sure that project will be carried through.
Downey will be 30 by the start of next season. Munster would be better off looking elsewhere.
When you look at it like that it makes sense. I'd contend that Munster should be fighting to win Heineken Cups and a 30 year old Downey with a lot of rugby behind him may not be the right guy to help them get to that level. He's certainly good enough to get in the team though and you're correct, wouldn't miss time for internationals.He'd give them two or three years to bring through a youngster there (such as, say, Hanrahan) while not taking up an NIQ slot. Two or three years is probably the most they'd get out of a NIQ anyway and out of the IQ options, he's probably the most sensible. Probably wouldn't be absent for international duty much either.
A Munster fan finally agrees with me! Earls is a good tackler but he's not a good defender. He's often caught out of position when he faces decent opposition 13s.I think Snoop we have to be smart and well I agree in regards 13 is a problem spot too because Earls is superb at running but doesn't have the creative lines like BOD and his defense needs to be more assured.
That's a good argument but not one I subscribe to. I'd argue that a 24 year old Ian Keatley or a 22 year old Scott Deasy have enough experience to step up at 12 if needs be. Hanrahan may be young but come next season he'll be 19. At 18/19/20 Nevin Spence, Craig Gilroy, Paddy Jackson, Andrew Conway, Brendan Macken, Ian McKinley and Luke Marshall all began to make the step up to Magners League level. I think Munster must bring through talented young players and not rely on short term signings to plug a gap. If Downey, for example, was brought in for 2 seasons, Hanrahan, Deasy and Keatley would be no further along in their development and another 12 would be brought in on another short contract.Snoopy, I'd agree that Munster need a long term 12, but all the options are young and someone to man the gap while they develop is needed.
Snoop you got it in one. Zebo and Nagle will probably see game time in Aironi. Ivan has been going well last few months and I personally hope he gets a go as when he played earlier in season he was good.
But still it's a nice strong team we are sending to Bristol and well watch out for Scanlon on the wing he has potential to be a great player.