Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
The Rugby Championship 2023
(2022 Rugby Championship - Round 3) - South Africa v Australia (27/8/2022)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cruz_del_Sur" data-source="post: 1099531" data-attributes="member: 55747"><p>No bias at all there. None whatsoever.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Dude.... DUDE!!!</p><p>you are arguably one of my prefered posters here and the main reason is you come across as one of the most objective posters. Bar's low, i know, but still.</p><p></p><p>There is a video of this. <s>If you don't think that's a slap then hopefully we can meet so i don't slap you.</s></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>When you show me which part of the laws care for what the defender's intentions are in a situation like this i'll consider that argument. Till then...</p><p></p><p>Swing, open hand, hits the face. Period.</p><p>These are not far-stretched interpretations of mine. I hope we can agree those 3 things happened.</p><p>The dictionary defines the concatenation of those three events as a slap.</p><p>Again, players have been banned from playing several world cup games for less.</p><p></p><p>---------</p><p>FOR THE RECORD, and to add insult to injury, his milking of the situation (sure) was poor at best. After the slap, he should have dropped to his knees (he did) AND grabbed his with both hands while dropping the ball. That's it. He would be an unquestionable victim of the situation as eyes are sacrosanct, and it is impossible for anyone to conclusively prove if there was the slightest touch of the cornea. </p><p></p><p>The YC would have been the same, we wouldn't have this ridiculous argument and Faf would be facing a disciplinary committee, probably getting away with it.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: that was out of order.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cruz_del_Sur, post: 1099531, member: 55747"] No bias at all there. None whatsoever. Dude.... DUDE!!! you are arguably one of my prefered posters here and the main reason is you come across as one of the most objective posters. Bar's low, i know, but still. There is a video of this. [S]If you don't think that's a slap then hopefully we can meet so i don't slap you.[/S] When you show me which part of the laws care for what the defender's intentions are in a situation like this i'll consider that argument. Till then... Swing, open hand, hits the face. Period. These are not far-stretched interpretations of mine. I hope we can agree those 3 things happened. The dictionary defines the concatenation of those three events as a slap. Again, players have been banned from playing several world cup games for less. --------- FOR THE RECORD, and to add insult to injury, his milking of the situation (sure) was poor at best. After the slap, he should have dropped to his knees (he did) AND grabbed his with both hands while dropping the ball. That's it. He would be an unquestionable victim of the situation as eyes are sacrosanct, and it is impossible for anyone to conclusively prove if there was the slightest touch of the cornea. The YC would have been the same, we wouldn't have this ridiculous argument and Faf would be facing a disciplinary committee, probably getting away with it. EDIT: that was out of order. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
The Rugby Championship 2023
(2022 Rugby Championship - Round 3) - South Africa v Australia (27/8/2022)
Top