Is it? Not with that scoreline.Now is this the advertisement we want for rugby, compared to the Lions Series?
Quality match so far, so surprised no Yellow Cards issued yet
It's not the fact that the All Blacks have held the Bledisloe for 19 years, it's the fact that the Wallabies are probably further away from winning it now than they've ever been. Hopefully the atrocious crowd at the game today will wake a few administrators up. People are getting bored of the same tired routine year after year. I've said it before and I'll say it again, do away with the 3 game series and make it a one-off match every year. Or even better, bin it for a few years. When the Wallabies are just not good enough to be competitive over 3 games, what is the point anymore?.I dunno why i torture myself by still watching Rugby. It's just one kick in the teeth to the next with the odd patch of respite.
By your logic the NZ v SA fixture should be snooze fest compared to NZ v Aus though. I mean you can be sure SA will bring our "absolutely atrocious quality of rugby".After watching an absolutely atrocious quality of rugby from both sides during the Lions series, seeing the All Blacks play is soooo refreshing; actually putting plays together, and attack, attack, attack. Especially with the 2nd Lions game being pretty much the worst game I've seen in my life, I'm excited to watch the rest of the games the AB's play this Rugby Championship. All Blacks vs South Africa can't come soon enough
They scraped past what some have referred too as France C, so something is definitely missingAussie did well vs France didn't they? And despite the loss the 1st Bledisloe as well. In my view its a young team and a team that needs time together. She'll be alright I think. It depends what the goals are though. I do remember the days where Aus were consistently ranked #3 in the world with minor blips and sometimes swapping with us into #2. I think they are still in that #3 bracket its just that there are so many teams in the top brackets now and the margins are sooo slim.
By your logic the NZ v SA fixture should be snooze fest compared to NZ v Aus though. I mean you can be sure SA will bring our "absolutely atrocious quality of rugby".
NZ v SA won't be a snooze fest, as NZ will actually try to play entertaining rugbyAussie did well vs France didn't they? And despite the loss the 1st Bledisloe as well. In my view its a young team and a team that needs time together. She'll be alright I think. It depends what the goals are though. I do remember the days where Aus were consistently ranked #3 in the world with minor blips and sometimes swapping with us into #2. I think they are still in that #3 bracket its just that there are so many teams in the top brackets now and the margins are sooo slim.
By your logic the NZ v SA fixture should be snooze fest compared to NZ v Aus though. I mean you can be sure SA will bring our "absolutely atrocious quality of rugby".
I don't think they try to play entertaining rugby at all. I think they play to win with what resources and strengths they have- IE attempt to leverage their point of difference. Like Japan that happens to be easy on the eye of the casual rugby fan.NZ v SA won't be a snooze fest, as NZ will actually try to play entertaining rugby
I think they were just waiting til the british and Irish lions finished . Gatlands decision not to go for the all blacks job because he was going to coach the lions was the reason foster only got two years initially.So Ian Foster has been reappointed through 2023…shocking decision by the NZRU, they should have waited at least until after the RC, if not the EOTY tour…
One would have thought that he was handed only 2 years in order to prove himself at the helm of the ABs…what exactly has he proved so far? Last year was abysmal and this year he won against either second tier nation or a highly inexperienced Aussie side. Not to mention that in the first game against Australia only Lolesio's night off the boot prevented the visitors winning the game.I think they were just waiting til the british and Irish lions finished . Gatlands decision not to go for the all blacks job because he was going to coach the lions was the reason foster only got two years initially.
and most people i talk too are pretty annoyed for exactly the reason you mention, i dont think people could actually name his prefered XV....and lots would disagree with the few names that seem to be carved in stone like savea at 8One would have thought that he was handed only 2 years in order to prove himself at the helm of the ABs…what exactly has he proved so far? Last year was abysmal and this year he won against either second tier nation or a highly inexperienced Aussie side. Not to mention that in the first game against Australia only Lolesio's night off the boot prevented the visitors winning the game.
What if the ABs lose both tests against the SA? Or the EOTY tour will reveal losses to France or Wales?
Appointing Foster through that farce of a process was a mistake, after the RWC 2019 failure, NZRU needed to start afresh. Foster is a continuation of the Hansen declining regime that started more or less with the Lions tour in 2017.
If I were a Kiwi, my blood would boil!