Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
[2016 Super Rugby] Kings vs. Jaguares (Round 14) 27/05/2016
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="saulan" data-source="post: 799341" data-attributes="member: 60236"><p>From my perspective, I actually have been really impressed with Creevey this season and think this Super rugby season has done great things for him as a captain, and he has definitely grown as a player. I don't think he has played in poor discipline and was unlucky that his tackle got cited because, although it was dangerous, there was no malice intent from him.</p><p></p><p>just for context though, the Creevey question was put on him, he had no interest in answering it (lead by example when you have been cited was the question from the panelist, I think Mallet thought it was **** and continued his previous thought path) and generally wanted to carry on his discussion he was having about Arguntinian rugby in general. On TV in context it didn't come across as Creevey criticism.</p><p></p><p>and again, from my perspective, Creevey has done an excellent job of referee management and keeping calm when interacting with the ref. I have said that in previous threads as well (think it was the Sharks game). The problem lies with other players in the squad.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="saulan, post: 799341, member: 60236"] From my perspective, I actually have been really impressed with Creevey this season and think this Super rugby season has done great things for him as a captain, and he has definitely grown as a player. I don't think he has played in poor discipline and was unlucky that his tackle got cited because, although it was dangerous, there was no malice intent from him. just for context though, the Creevey question was put on him, he had no interest in answering it (lead by example when you have been cited was the question from the panelist, I think Mallet thought it was **** and continued his previous thought path) and generally wanted to carry on his discussion he was having about Arguntinian rugby in general. On TV in context it didn't come across as Creevey criticism. and again, from my perspective, Creevey has done an excellent job of referee management and keeping calm when interacting with the ref. I have said that in previous threads as well (think it was the Sharks game). The problem lies with other players in the squad. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
[2016 Super Rugby] Kings vs. Jaguares (Round 14) 27/05/2016
Top