Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
[2016 Super Rugby] Kings vs. Jaguares (Round 14) 27/05/2016
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cruz_del_Sur" data-source="post: 799334" data-attributes="member: 55747"><p>Thanks for sharing saulan</p><p>Let me use a part to emphasize what i see as part of the problem. </p><p></p><p></p><p>That is not only biased but simply unacceptable and completely inconsistent with the previous argument he made. On one hand he asks for Creevy to be lead by example and then he finds it perfectly acceptable for the referee to "lose his patience". That is ridiculous, i'd say even stupid. </p><p>And one has to wonder how does Mallet reconcile the "he was so fed up with those guys" part with the fact that the kings committed more penalties than the jaguares. </p><p>Are we supposed to believe that the jaguares 12 penalties were more patience wrecking than the kings' 14? That's a very, very hard sell. </p><p></p><p>I agree to a point about our temperamental nature, but he completely loses the plot later on. </p><p>What's the saying? The fact that we are paranoid doesn't mean we are wrong. He is saying we are and evidence suggests otherwise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cruz_del_Sur, post: 799334, member: 55747"] Thanks for sharing saulan Let me use a part to emphasize what i see as part of the problem. That is not only biased but simply unacceptable and completely inconsistent with the previous argument he made. On one hand he asks for Creevy to be lead by example and then he finds it perfectly acceptable for the referee to "lose his patience". That is ridiculous, i'd say even stupid. And one has to wonder how does Mallet reconcile the "he was so fed up with those guys" part with the fact that the kings committed more penalties than the jaguares. Are we supposed to believe that the jaguares 12 penalties were more patience wrecking than the kings' 14? That's a very, very hard sell. I agree to a point about our temperamental nature, but he completely loses the plot later on. What's the saying? The fact that we are paranoid doesn't mean we are wrong. He is saying we are and evidence suggests otherwise. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
[2016 Super Rugby] Kings vs. Jaguares (Round 14) 27/05/2016
Top