Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
2014 Super Rugby: Blues v Crusaders (Round 3)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darwin" data-source="post: 626637" data-attributes="member: 24910"><p>I've always had a bit of time for Andy Ellis. He is an excellent support player, has a very good kicking game, and I think he reads the game better than any other halfback in the country. The thing that has always held him back is his passing - indeed that is the main reason he isn't still in the AB's now. At best is passing can be described as 'ok', but I thought it was very poor last night. It lacked any speed, and was very inaccurate. I can't remember a single time Tom Taylor was given a flat pass he could actually run onto - a lot of the passes he took well above his head or down very low. Ellis's passing has never been fantastic but is usually ok - the Crusaders need much better service from him if they want to create anything on attack. </p><p> </p><p>I don't think Heinz is half the player that Ellis is - he doesn't control the game near as well and is prone to the odd shocker, but he does have a much better pass. I just wonder whether they will consider starting Heinz next week and see what the backline can do with a bit more time and space (Ellis can always come on if Heinz is struggling).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There is no guarantee either Kerr or Hickey last more than a season or two, but based on the evidence thus far I think they are clearly better options than Benji Marshall. I can understand people calling for Marshall ahead of Noakes - Noakes is as good as he will ever be - but Kerr and Hickey are both very talented young players with the potential to be excellent Super Rugby players. Let's compare the players:</p><p></p><p> Marshall is 29, has basically no experience at rugby union, and showed nothing in the pre-season to suggest he is ready for Super Rugby. He can however pass the ball behind his back.</p><p>Kerr is 24, has been outstanding for Counties over the last two ITM Cup seasons, and has not looked out of place at Super Rguby level so far. He is a strong defender, can take the ball to the line, and seems to know how to control the game.</p><p> Hickey has just turned 20, and is one of the most talented young 10's in NZ rugby. He is an excellent goal-kicker, has a good tactical kicking game, is a courageous defender, and doesn't mind taking the ball to the line. He started for the NZ U20 side last season, and is still eligible for them this season. He had a very good ITM Cup last season for Auckland as a 19 years old, and had just made a very promising debut for the Blues. </p><p></p><p>I'm sure the Blues will feel obliged to play Marshall given the price the paid for him, but investing in Kerr or Hickey would be far better bets if they are looking to the future (as well as being the best option right now). I'm not saying that Marshall won't develop into a quality Rugby Union player, but if he does it will take some time (I'm thinking years rather than weeks), especially given 10 is a very specialist position (how many league players have successful been transformed in 10's in union?).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darwin, post: 626637, member: 24910"] I've always had a bit of time for Andy Ellis. He is an excellent support player, has a very good kicking game, and I think he reads the game better than any other halfback in the country. The thing that has always held him back is his passing - indeed that is the main reason he isn't still in the AB's now. At best is passing can be described as 'ok', but I thought it was very poor last night. It lacked any speed, and was very inaccurate. I can't remember a single time Tom Taylor was given a flat pass he could actually run onto - a lot of the passes he took well above his head or down very low. Ellis's passing has never been fantastic but is usually ok - the Crusaders need much better service from him if they want to create anything on attack. I don't think Heinz is half the player that Ellis is - he doesn't control the game near as well and is prone to the odd shocker, but he does have a much better pass. I just wonder whether they will consider starting Heinz next week and see what the backline can do with a bit more time and space (Ellis can always come on if Heinz is struggling). There is no guarantee either Kerr or Hickey last more than a season or two, but based on the evidence thus far I think they are clearly better options than Benji Marshall. I can understand people calling for Marshall ahead of Noakes - Noakes is as good as he will ever be - but Kerr and Hickey are both very talented young players with the potential to be excellent Super Rugby players. Let's compare the players: Marshall is 29, has basically no experience at rugby union, and showed nothing in the pre-season to suggest he is ready for Super Rugby. He can however pass the ball behind his back. Kerr is 24, has been outstanding for Counties over the last two ITM Cup seasons, and has not looked out of place at Super Rguby level so far. He is a strong defender, can take the ball to the line, and seems to know how to control the game. Hickey has just turned 20, and is one of the most talented young 10's in NZ rugby. He is an excellent goal-kicker, has a good tactical kicking game, is a courageous defender, and doesn't mind taking the ball to the line. He started for the NZ U20 side last season, and is still eligible for them this season. He had a very good ITM Cup last season for Auckland as a 19 years old, and had just made a very promising debut for the Blues. I'm sure the Blues will feel obliged to play Marshall given the price the paid for him, but investing in Kerr or Hickey would be far better bets if they are looking to the future (as well as being the best option right now). I'm not saying that Marshall won't develop into a quality Rugby Union player, but if he does it will take some time (I'm thinking years rather than weeks), especially given 10 is a very specialist position (how many league players have successful been transformed in 10's in union?). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
2014 Super Rugby: Blues v Crusaders (Round 3)
Top