Take out the Wales mistakes then the scoreline would have been different, probably a greater scoreline for Wales. All ifs, buts and coconuts.
Fallacious logic there my friend, but you're not fooling this guy with it. I'm talking about an outright mistake by the ref.: North pushes the ball backwards and Parisse kicks forward and controls. No knock-on. Barely one defender back for Wales and a few meters to run, with company I reckon on the right for the Italian no.8.
You're telling me about mistakes (that may've not happened in some parallel universe).
Entirely different realms: Parisse had a real chance, nothing hypothetical about it, it just never happened coz a whistle was blown.
I'm not saying Italy would've won it, but I won't just sit there and read a comment like that either. Good win for Wales, and that's that.
If North had stepped inwards, committing both defenders then AWJ would have in theory been in. Instead North stepped outwards, taking up precious space and passing allowing the covering defence not to be committed ... a genuine chance ...
Again all ifs and buts and I'm going by your logic here!
nah man, what you're saying is wrong, but we're not spending hours on that point, it's not that important...
Difference is that is a player making the wrong decision, something he had control over. The case Big Ewis made was the ref making completely the wrong decision and thus costing Italy a likely try. However I personally feel that the later Italian try had a forward pass in it so it evened out.
Sadly I'm not ... if it wasn't important why bring it up? :lol:
everything you say during the daily life a question of life or death ?
Fair enough Ewis. You're right that it wasn't a knock-on. I don't think it was a guaranteed try though, Halfpenny was there to tackle Parisse (and did), and the Welsh players then stopped as the whistle went.