Big Ewis
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2011
- Messages
- 10,573
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Strong effort by New Zealand A - they look to have been more of a challenge to South Africa than our top side was
Unfortunately I had a prior commitment I could not get out of (no matter how much I protested) so I missed the match.
While I'm glad to see us in the semis I would have preferred to be facing England rather than South Africa again. I probably shouldn't complain - we were lucky to make the semis - but we are still probably psychologically scarred from the hammering South Africa gave us in the last match!
I dunno what the rule is about these things, so I won't post the link, but the game is on youtube if you search for it.
I know its early but so far, who are the contenders for JWC player of the tournament?
You'd think that because those teams had a lot of big names. The 2012 side that beat the Baby Boks had Henderson, Hanrahan, Furlong, Conan and a few others. They're all big talents but in that squad was also some below par players. This team doesn't have many below par players and the squad seems to be stronger. More U19s in this squad so that could be a reason for them taking a bit of time to get up to speed.
The 6 nations didn't go well but they might as well have been playing water polo the weather was so bad.
Hickey is out for the AB's (ankle)
Can't see them beat the Bokkies.
See you in the final England, let's settle this
Jo-jo-jo! Writing off any NZ rugby team like that.... I like it. I'm not sure if I trust it but I do like it!
I think looking at comparative strength of opponent is more of an answer. First year without one of New Zealand, south Africa or England if memory serves.
Thats true but its not the whole truth.
Its very even between this side and last years side.
The 2012 team were good but they were very strong from 1 - 10 but not great from 11 - 15.
Can't agree. Looked up a team-sheet. Farrell, Coghlan-Murray and Nelson were all players I rated back then - Olding regularly came off the bench - thought Michael Sherlock could have been more than he was.
Coghlan-Murray hasn't broken into the Leinster team yet. Nelson hasn't broken into the Ulster team and doesn't look like he will. Farrell has to leave Ulster for Grenoble, although he is potentially very good. Sherlock dropped out of rugby so we'll never know with him. Also in that team was the sub standard Foster Horan. FH was a center who couldn't pass a rugby ball and who was only there because he played for Ruddock's Lansdowne club.
Compare those with Ringrose/Goggin/Kelleher/Wootton/Gaffney. Theres no weak links in the 2014 players, the center partnership is much more dangerous and the handling and passing is better than 2012 player's. Apart from Chris Farrell, the 2014 players are all bigger too. Pity the 2012 forwards and 2013 backs were not around at the same time because it would have been a strong contender to win the JWC.
That's not really how it worked out. SCM is a very dangerous player and not breaking into the Leinster team with 4 internationals playing there is hardly a black mark against a 22 year old. Kelleher won't have broken into the Leinster team by the time he's 22 either. Farrell did his cruciate and lost over a season allowing Olding and McCloskey to get in ahead that's why he's leaving. He's plenty of talent and was highly rated. Foster Horan wasn't the best passer but he did his job very well. He was excellent at the crash ball and a big hitter. He was also used on the wing by the end where he had some stand out performances whil Olding played centre.
If you really wanted to pick a backline to go with 2012's pack then 2011 is the one.
I don't see how we can judge guys like SCM against guys like Ringrose except by their underage credentials. Who knows how either will go?
All I can say is I look back the team sheets and there was some serious talent for the age group there. I simply can't agree that the 2012 side was lacking talent outside of 10.
And, as mentioned, SCM lost a year to meningitis, Farrell's lost two years to injury, and Nelson just lost a year to Anscombe being a prick.
Hickey is out for the AB's (ankle)
Can't see them beat the Bokkies.
See you in the final England, let's settle this
I don't see how we can judge guys like SCM against guys like Ringrose except by their underage credentials. Who knows how either will go?
All I can say is I look back the team sheets and there was some serious talent for the age group there. I simply can't agree that the 2012 side was lacking talent outside of 10.
And, as mentioned, SCM lost a year to meningitis, Farrell's lost two years to injury, and Nelson just lost a year to Anscombe being a prick.