• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

who simply doesnt deserve there place in the lions squad, or who should be replaced if possible due

  • Thread starter Thread starter samtheman
  • Start date Start date
Too early really to make any kind of conclusive statement about it with 7 games still to go, but im bored so i'll do it anyway.

Powell - one dimensional and isnt even on form. Gamble hasnt really paid off so far.

Rees - Decent player but couldnt hit a blimp with a rocket launcher. His selection above Best is inexplicable.
 
Williams probably did deserve his place when selected but I don't think he deserves a test place now. Let's face it though, he is there because he's Shane Williams.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Hall @ Jun 10 2009, 01:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Williams probably did deserve his place when selected but I don't think he deserves a test place now. Let's face it though, he is there because he's Shane Williams.[/b]

We have the same issue in the Springbok camp. Schalk Burger doesn't deserve to be there, but he is because he is Schalk Burger. Reputation far out-weighs form.

MOD Prestwick says:

C_71_article_1015811_image_list_image_list_item_0_image.jpg
 
It does sound a bit confusing. Curse my South African way!!! What i mean is that he is in the squad thanks to the reputation he has, as opposed to the form he is in...

Uuuuuuhhhhhhnnnnnnn!

MOD Prestwick says:

C_71_article_1015811_image_list_image_list_item_0_image.jpg
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jer1cho @ Jun 10 2009, 05:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
What the hell???!!!???

MOD Prestwick says:

C_71_article_1015811_image_list_image_list_item_0_image.jpg
[/b]

The words you type are not of an honest nature. Burger is great. I would even go so far as to say...

Burger > Chabal
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Hall @ Jun 10 2009, 06:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jer1cho @ Jun 10 2009, 05:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What the hell???!!!???

MOD Prestwick says:

C_71_article_1015811_image_list_image_list_item_0_image.jpg
[/b]

The words you type are not of an honest nature. Burger is great. I would even go so far as to say...

Burger > Chabal


[/b][/quote]

:cheers:

Burger uses Croft as a toothpick after he's done eating Chabal
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Olyy @ Jun 9 2009, 10:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Shane Williams, based on recent performance/lions performance, shouldn't be there imo
Keith Earls - was surprised to see him called up, not as good as any of the other wingers and he hasn't played very well
Worseley - can tackle but not much else
Shaw - good player in his day but past it imo[/b]

someone that agrees with me

thank you
 
TBH I think Worsley would be a good 19 for the test matches, the Boks will probably be throwing up bombs in the 10 - 13 channels and shoulders will get tired by 60 minutes. Having a fresh Joe on the field would be a good countermeasure to a late try through defensive tiring.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (dundeesmiffy @ Jun 11 2009, 09:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
TBH I think Worsley would be a good 19 for the test matches, the Boks will probably be throwing up bombs in the 10 - 13 channels and shoulders will get tired by 60 minutes. Having a fresh Joe on the field would be a good countermeasure to a late try through defensive tiring.[/b]
That's a good point, i've no idea how well the Lions will perform against SA, it might be 80minutes of defending, where a big hitter will be needed
 
I'm beginning to become more convinced that Worsley was only picked for his performance v Wales in the 6N.
 
You mean if I stand around in Cardiff and let a bunch of really short Welshmen run into me for 80 minutes, I could become a Lion too? o.O
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Teh Mite @ Jun 12 2009, 12:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
You mean if I stand around in Cardiff and let a bunch of really short Welshmen run into me for 80 minutes, I could become a Lion too? o.O[/b]
No, silly.





You don't support or play for Wasps.
 

Latest posts

Sponsored
UnlistMe
Back
Top