Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Transfers 2014/15
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nickdnz" data-source="post: 674140" data-attributes="member: 38640"><p>Hayman isn't better than Zirakashvili huh...</p><p></p><p>I'd also take Burden over Kayser, Smith over Chouly, Mitchell 1000000x over Guildford. I think you're being very generous to many Clermont players.</p><p></p><p>As for my comment, I was making the point that Toulon's roster are filled with as many rugby players close to house hold names as possible. Not trying to imply you didn't know anything about rugby...</p><p></p><p>Regardless I believe Toulon's results support my assessment that they have the better players, particularly when you look at their depth.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nickdnz, post: 674140, member: 38640"] Hayman isn't better than Zirakashvili huh... I'd also take Burden over Kayser, Smith over Chouly, Mitchell 1000000x over Guildford. I think you're being very generous to many Clermont players. As for my comment, I was making the point that Toulon's roster are filled with as many rugby players close to house hold names as possible. Not trying to imply you didn't know anything about rugby... Regardless I believe Toulon's results support my assessment that they have the better players, particularly when you look at their depth. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Transfers 2014/15
Top