Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="I Bleed Black" data-source="post: 168136">anyone else getting sick of these &quot;because france was the better team&quot; reasons for the win? not saying it wasnt but this is the talking balls section. this is the pub of the trf-ville. if you go to the pub, where there is in-depth conversation about a teams loss, and you say, becasue the other team was better, you will get kicked stait back out. this thread is one of the best and most intelligent ive seen in a while. its obviouslly worth talking about. maybies, what if&#039;s and could haves is the whole point of a forum. a conversation doesnt have to end a day after the game is played.[/b]</blockquote>&nbsp;And if it comes down to simple things like team A was better than team B, then we get to discuss why and in what ways they were so. Lets face it, it was the biggest shock of the world cup, the most controvesial match of the world cup. It requires in depth discussion. As rugby fans we would be negligent not to.[/b][/quote]Sorry guys - my bad.&nbsp; Im just one for looking forward, instead staying on the round-about till I throw up.How far do you go back through the history of the recent all blacks to find the factor than lost them the game?&nbsp; If we aren&#039;t careful this will end up being the longest postmortem in recent history. The All Blacks loss can be blamed on nothing (i.e. a game they just didnt win because they weren&#039;t good enough on the day) or we can all find 30-40 things that lost us the game.&nbsp; I suppose it all comes down how you look at things.&nbsp; Me personally??&nbsp; Bring on the Super 14 and some more tests this year.&nbsp; Always looking forward, but remembering where we&#039;ve been.Anyways I&#039;ll let you guys get back to it - sorry for the intrusion.&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE="I Bleed Black, post: 168136"] anyone else getting sick of these "because france was the better team" reasons for the win? not saying it wasnt but this is the talking balls section. this is the pub of the trf-ville. if you go to the pub, where there is in-depth conversation about a teams loss, and you say, becasue the other team was better, you will get kicked stait back out. this thread is one of the best and most intelligent ive seen in a while. its obviouslly worth talking about. maybies, what if's and could haves is the whole point of a forum. a conversation doesnt have to end a day after the game is played. [/b][/quote] And if it comes down to simple things like team A was better than team B, then we get to discuss why and in what ways they were so. Lets face it, it was the biggest shock of the world cup, the most controvesial match of the world cup. It requires in depth discussion. As rugby fans we would be negligent not to. [/b][/quote] Sorry guys - my bad. Im just one for looking forward, instead staying on the round-about till I throw up. How far do you go back through the history of the recent all blacks to find the factor than lost them the game? If we aren't careful this will end up being the longest postmortem in recent history. The All Blacks loss can be blamed on nothing (i.e. a game they just didnt win because they weren't good enough on the day) or we can all find 30-40 things that lost us the game. I suppose it all comes down how you look at things. Me personally?? Bring on the Super 14 and some more tests this year. Always looking forward, but remembering where we've been. Anyways I'll let you guys get back to it - sorry for the intrusion. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification