Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
The Andre de Waal High Kicks Theorem
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andre de Waal" data-source="post: 1165036" data-attributes="member: 87905"><p>Thanks EE <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Great discourse! I FULLY understand and appreciate your points about territorial advantage and the percentage game.</p><p>To me tactical box kicks do indeed turn the opposition (Pat Lambie (Sharks) single-handedly hammered W Province in one Curry Cup Final with continued "dinks" over the oppo backline). However, continued aimless(?) high kicks (a la Springboks, very predictable) very often result in possession turnover if the kicking team isn't sufficiently capable of fulfilling your:</p><p></p><p>So, apart from all the discussions about territory (perhaps I shouldn't have posted a preamble <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />, and very definitely your points regarding pressurizing mistakes), the Theorem in its simplest form remains irrefutable in terms of Possession.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andre de Waal, post: 1165036, member: 87905"] Thanks EE :) Great discourse! I FULLY understand and appreciate your points about territorial advantage and the percentage game. To me tactical box kicks do indeed turn the opposition (Pat Lambie (Sharks) single-handedly hammered W Province in one Curry Cup Final with continued "dinks" over the oppo backline). However, continued aimless(?) high kicks (a la Springboks, very predictable) very often result in possession turnover if the kicking team isn't sufficiently capable of fulfilling your: So, apart from all the discussions about territory (perhaps I shouldn't have posted a preamble :), and very definitely your points regarding pressurizing mistakes), the Theorem in its simplest form remains irrefutable in terms of Possession. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
The Andre de Waal High Kicks Theorem
Top