Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Tier Two & Three Rugby
SuperLiga Americana de Rugby (SLAR)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lucas R" data-source="post: 1145778" data-attributes="member: 74451"><p>there is not much rugby in Panama. Colombia had a team and coundlt maintained it, the argentine union ended paying for its second year, the last one before the end. It ended being a second argentine team. I dont think its the moment to add countries with barely any rugby. Only brazil makes sense, its a big market, and it has enough people to get a somewhat competitive team (still being last). As for the rest, stay with the ones with tradition in the southern cone, get chile and uruguay consistenly on T2 and the world cups, add more argie teams, maybe a second uruguayan and chilean on the mid future, and leave one in Paraguay and Brazil for a long time.</p><p></p><p>I dont think we'll gain much from adding a random lets say peruvian team, to get full of more argentine players, get more in Argentina were people go to the stadium and you can grow an audiance</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lucas R, post: 1145778, member: 74451"] there is not much rugby in Panama. Colombia had a team and coundlt maintained it, the argentine union ended paying for its second year, the last one before the end. It ended being a second argentine team. I dont think its the moment to add countries with barely any rugby. Only brazil makes sense, its a big market, and it has enough people to get a somewhat competitive team (still being last). As for the rest, stay with the ones with tradition in the southern cone, get chile and uruguay consistenly on T2 and the world cups, add more argie teams, maybe a second uruguayan and chilean on the mid future, and leave one in Paraguay and Brazil for a long time. I dont think we'll gain much from adding a random lets say peruvian team, to get full of more argentine players, get more in Argentina were people go to the stadium and you can grow an audiance [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Tier Two & Three Rugby
SuperLiga Americana de Rugby (SLAR)
Top