Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Super10 1993-1995; should it count?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cave Dweller" data-source="post: 502200" data-attributes="member: 61500"><p>Super 15 started in ??</p><p>Super 12 started in ?? </p><p>4x15=60 last time I checked</p><p></p><p>No I am not. Do you know SARU? Politics first, money second rugby third. Thats them. It took them 2 years and a 60 point mauling of the Currie Cup champions by the Blues before they realized that Currie Cup unions with a few quality players while the others is watching it on tv is not going to work. I mean hell the Kings saga should give a clear picture how they think. Add to that the stupid negotiating due to the fact they eyes lit up to the brief case of cash standing next to them and signing away the Currie Cup. So they did no they are just concerned with other things rather than rugby sadlyThat is your opinion but it is not a fact. Nor will posting a log make it one. By that argument all WC prior to 99 should not be accounted for. Number of games played or if there were a semi final or not will not be a factor as the concept basically stayed the same. That is the top teams from NZ, Australia and SA competed against each other where the two top teams played in the final. We used different structures with our Currie cup and formats does that mean every time it changes previous results should not be considered? Nor should getting payed to play and pay for fun be a reason for not being included as it is irrelevant.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cave Dweller, post: 502200, member: 61500"] Super 15 started in ?? Super 12 started in ?? 4x15=60 last time I checked No I am not. Do you know SARU? Politics first, money second rugby third. Thats them. It took them 2 years and a 60 point mauling of the Currie Cup champions by the Blues before they realized that Currie Cup unions with a few quality players while the others is watching it on tv is not going to work. I mean hell the Kings saga should give a clear picture how they think. Add to that the stupid negotiating due to the fact they eyes lit up to the brief case of cash standing next to them and signing away the Currie Cup. So they did no they are just concerned with other things rather than rugby sadlyThat is your opinion but it is not a fact. Nor will posting a log make it one. By that argument all WC prior to 99 should not be accounted for. Number of games played or if there were a semi final or not will not be a factor as the concept basically stayed the same. That is the top teams from NZ, Australia and SA competed against each other where the two top teams played in the final. We used different structures with our Currie cup and formats does that mean every time it changes previous results should not be considered? Nor should getting payed to play and pay for fun be a reason for not being included as it is irrelevant. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Super10 1993-1995; should it count?
Top