Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Super Rugby: Chiefs - Crusaders in Hamilton (6/7/2012)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shovenose" data-source="post: 515908" data-attributes="member: 62077"><p>Again. It was a TMO decision so all that is irrelevant. What is relevant and what you should look at is the TMO protocol and its scope.</p><p></p><p>Golden rule of refereeing is not to guess. If you did not see it then do not guess and making a call on players reactions. The referee was unsighted hence why he asked the TMO. According to protocol from the IRB a referee is not allowed to respond to any additional information from the TMO which does not relate to his original question. What was the original question?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shovenose, post: 515908, member: 62077"] Again. It was a TMO decision so all that is irrelevant. What is relevant and what you should look at is the TMO protocol and its scope. Golden rule of refereeing is not to guess. If you did not see it then do not guess and making a call on players reactions. The referee was unsighted hence why he asked the TMO. According to protocol from the IRB a referee is not allowed to respond to any additional information from the TMO which does not relate to his original question. What was the original question? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Super Rugby: Chiefs - Crusaders in Hamilton (6/7/2012)
Top