Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Super Rugby: Chiefs - Crusaders in Hamilton (6/7/2012)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nickdnz" data-source="post: 515906" data-attributes="member: 38640"><p>I understand the context, I looked it up <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>However the law is true regardless of what application it is used in. If a <strong>defending </strong>player has one or more feet ingoal then the player himself is in fact ingoal, and you can't penalise someone for holding up the ball why he is indeed ingoal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nickdnz, post: 515906, member: 38640"] I understand the context, I looked it up :p However the law is true regardless of what application it is used in. If a [B]defending [/B]player has one or more feet ingoal then the player himself is in fact ingoal, and you can't penalise someone for holding up the ball why he is indeed ingoal. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Super Rugby: Chiefs - Crusaders in Hamilton (6/7/2012)
Top