Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Super Rugby: Chiefs - Crusaders in Hamilton (6/7/2012)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nickdnz" data-source="post: 515893" data-attributes="member: 38640"><p>Kerr-Barlow cearly has one if not both feet in goal at the time of the breakdown, so he is deemed to be in goal.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So I see your line of thought. The only thing that I'd suggest is that because <strong>Kerr-Barlow's feet were both in goal </strong>(which is importent, not if Ellis is in the goal line), it's allowed to be held up and not released.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nickdnz, post: 515893, member: 38640"] Kerr-Barlow cearly has one if not both feet in goal at the time of the breakdown, so he is deemed to be in goal. So I see your line of thought. The only thing that I'd suggest is that because [B]Kerr-Barlow's feet were both in goal [/B](which is importent, not if Ellis is in the goal line), it's allowed to be held up and not released. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Super Rugby: Chiefs - Crusaders in Hamilton (6/7/2012)
Top