Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Super Rugby: Chiefs - Crusaders in Hamilton (6/7/2012)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nickdnz" data-source="post: 515881" data-attributes="member: 38640"><p>The reason I think is double movement, which is a fair call. He fell short of the line but within an arms length of the line, which if he placed it forward it would have been a try. He needed to place the ball backwards. Whitelock driving hom from where he was initially is a double movement?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nickdnz, post: 515881, member: 38640"] The reason I think is double movement, which is a fair call. He fell short of the line but within an arms length of the line, which if he placed it forward it would have been a try. He needed to place the ball backwards. Whitelock driving hom from where he was initially is a double movement? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Super Rugby: Chiefs - Crusaders in Hamilton (6/7/2012)
Top