Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JW." data-source="post: 453084" data-attributes="member: 53447">Imagine the IRB hosting a RWC, they can&#039;t even manage Rugby as it stands now there would be a major fight at the end of that <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />. But that article claimed the IRB &#039;stole&#039; the RWC from ARU and NZRU and ran off with it.I agree every IRB member will try and protect there own season, but as it stands now IMO it&#039;s fine. Both parties sacrifice something, Trinations would be shorter once a year every 4 and the Super start a bit earlier every 4. The NH comps miss there star players for 6+ weeks and lose some revenue because not as many people are coming to watch.As I see that both sides lose a bit, but thats how it will always be the way it is now seems the easiest and fairest we can make it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JW., post: 453084, member: 53447"] Imagine the IRB hosting a RWC, they can't even manage Rugby as it stands now there would be a major fight at the end of that :p. But that article claimed the IRB 'stole' the RWC from ARU and NZRU and ran off with it. I agree every IRB member will try and protect there own season, but as it stands now IMO it's fine. Both parties sacrifice something, Trinations would be shorter once a year every 4 and the Super start a bit earlier every 4. The NH comps miss there star players for 6+ weeks and lose some revenue because not as many people are coming to watch. As I see that both sides lose a bit, but thats how it will always be the way it is now seems the easiest and fairest we can make it. [/QUOTE]

Verification