Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Which Tyler" data-source="post: 827136" data-attributes="member: 73592">Someone with twitter should use it at him next time he tweets something worth reading.Could be a while then.Yup, I&#039;ve always favoured head-to-head as the first tie breaker; with tries scored coming next - Like Mike though, I&#039;ve never been a fan of BPs, and after all these years, I remain to be convinced they make much difference to the entertainment available in matches (as opposed to highlights reels, where tries are all that matters).If we HAVE to use bonus points; then the French system of 3 MORE tries than your oponent is the better system IMO. I&#039;d also reduce the requirement for LBP to 5 points.It should definitely be tweeted to him in responce for him complaining about receiving banter* about it.* Sorry, &quot;bants&quot;, it IS Haskell after all.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Which Tyler, post: 827136, member: 73592"] Someone with twitter should use it at him next time he tweets something worth reading. Could be a while then. Yup, I've always favoured head-to-head as the first tie breaker; with tries scored coming next - Like Mike though, I've never been a fan of BPs, and after all these years, I remain to be convinced they make much difference to the entertainment available in matches (as opposed to highlights reels, where tries are all that matters). If we HAVE to use bonus points; then the French system of 3 MORE tries than your oponent is the better system IMO. I'd also reduce the requirement for LBP to 5 points. It should definitely be tweeted to him in responce for him complaining about receiving banter* about it. * Sorry, "bants", it IS Haskell after all. [/QUOTE]

Verification