Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Peat" data-source="post: 437800" data-attributes="member: 42330">Correct me if I&#039;ve got this wrong - you have published the stats, but the actual decisions on them were taken by another company (in France, according to earlier in the thread), and they based their decision entirely on statistical analysis? Did you check them yourselves/with another body before publishing?Can I suggest that a) You think long and hard about using this company again, as they appear to have let you down quite badly b) In future, taking a leaf out of Sports Interactive&#039;s book, and use your forums to get the fan&#039;s opinion/insight? We may not be experts, or have all the data. We may contain a number of the totally biased, totally stupid, and totally trolling. But as a consensus, I&#039;d say we&#039;re not far off, and we certainly know that Saracens aren&#039;t a mid-table side.What&#039;s more, we&#039;d do it for free, for the joy of it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Peat, post: 437800, member: 42330"] Correct me if I've got this wrong - you have published the stats, but the actual decisions on them were taken by another company (in France, according to earlier in the thread), and they based their decision entirely on statistical analysis? Did you check them yourselves/with another body before publishing? Can I suggest that a) You think long and hard about using this company again, as they appear to have let you down quite badly b) In future, taking a leaf out of Sports Interactive's book, and use your forums to get the fan's opinion/insight? We may not be experts, or have all the data. We may contain a number of the totally biased, totally stupid, and totally trolling. But as a consensus, I'd say we're not far off, and we certainly know that Saracens aren't a mid-table side. What's more, we'd do it for free, for the joy of it. [/QUOTE]

Verification