Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Seaton" data-source="post: 434661" data-attributes="member: 64443">Well, in response to your post.Whaaaaat? We turned down several kickable penalties in search of tries, fairly well dominated play including possesion and territory.The main problem why the nwin was so narrow is because we eschewed those penalties, if we had taken them then we would have lead and not have to play &#039;catch-up&#039; (as it really was only one score away), which would have left the players more confident, they just seemed frantic at times, so much so that we never got enough players to the rucks, because they were all thinking&nbsp; of what they are&nbsp; going to do with the ball next, rather than protecting.In short, I disagree <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Seaton, post: 434661, member: 64443"] Well, in response to your post. Whaaaaat? We turned down several kickable penalties in search of tries, fairly well dominated play including possesion and territory. The main problem why the nwin was so narrow is because we eschewed those penalties, if we had taken them then we would have lead and not have to play 'catch-up' (as it really was only one score away), which would have left the players more confident, they just seemed frantic at times, so much so that we never got enough players to the rucks, because they were all thinking of what they are going to do with the ball next, rather than protecting. In short, I disagree ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification