Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Rugby World Cup 2023
[RWC2023] South Africa vs Scotland (10/09/2023)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cruz_del_Sur" data-source="post: 1144926" data-attributes="member: 55747"><p>Interesting, thanks for sharing. My thoughts. That is a RC. No conspiracy, no nothing, ref made a mistake, that's all. </p><p>Two comments. </p><p></p><p>1) </p><p>From the link</p><p></p><p>"Not that I have to educate you on this, but we all know that if it isn't direct head contact – which it wasn't, because he made contact on the ball and then moved up after he tackled on the ball – then it is not an issue."</p><p></p><p>If i understand correctly, he is stating that if your arms made first contact, and they did so legally, then the head clash is as if it never happened. I don't believe that is true. </p><p></p><p>2) The second video does look better. The problem i have is with 'why?' it looks better. My opinion is it looks better precisely because it prevents you from watching quite a relevant piece of the puzzle here. </p><p></p><p>my two cents.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cruz_del_Sur, post: 1144926, member: 55747"] Interesting, thanks for sharing. My thoughts. That is a RC. No conspiracy, no nothing, ref made a mistake, that's all. Two comments. 1) From the link "Not that I have to educate you on this, but we all know that if it isn't direct head contact – which it wasn't, because he made contact on the ball and then moved up after he tackled on the ball – then it is not an issue." If i understand correctly, he is stating that if your arms made first contact, and they did so legally, then the head clash is as if it never happened. I don't believe that is true. 2) The second video does look better. The problem i have is with 'why?' it looks better. My opinion is it looks better precisely because it prevents you from watching quite a relevant piece of the puzzle here. my two cents. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Rugby World Cup 2023
[RWC2023] South Africa vs Scotland (10/09/2023)
Top