• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Rugby World Cup Team Ratings

King_D'Arcy

First XV
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
1,469
Country Flag
Nauru
I thought a fun way to look back over this years RWC would be to rate each team out of 10.

Pool A

New Zealand 9/10 -
Deserving champions. Totally dominant in every match bar the final. New Zealand are definitely head and shoulders above the rest of the world. They lost their best player early on and still managed to do it convincingly.

France 7/10 - Definitely the toughest team to rate. Never great except for in the final. They still managed to get there though which is impressive, regardless of how it happened. They have to lose points for losing to Tonga though.

Tonga 8/10 - Impressive against France. Messed up their own chances of qualifying by losing to Canada earlier in the competition though. Still, the win against France alone earns them a high rating.

Canada 7/10 - They definitely look like a team on the rise. Did well to come and beat Tonga. Was probably their number 1 goal coming into the competition really. Hilarious repeat of 207 by drawing with Japan.

Japan 6/10 - Another world cup without a win for the Japs. Was hoping for better from them. Maybe my expectations of them were too high but I thought they were good enough to compete with Pacific Island teams.


Pool B

England 7/10 - They managed to come out on top of their gritty group. Failed to inspire in any of their matches but any team that can top their group by playing half-well is a good team.

Argentina 7/10 - Argentina always bring their best performances to the world cup. This year was no exception. Unfortunately their team this year isn't as good as previous Argentinian world cup teams so they could only do so much. They still challenged every team they met, including the All Blacks to an extent.

Scotland 5/10 - Will they ever find their feet. They're still struggling to score tries even against minnow sides. Should've won their match against England.

Georgia 7/10 - Won their main match against Romania and gave Scotland and Argentina a scare.

Romania 6/10 - Didn't win a match but gave Scotland a bit of a scare.


Pool C

Ireland 8/10 - Really good games against Aus, Russia and Italy. Poor against Wales though. Still; It's the best world cup we've ever had... which is sort of sad :(

Australia 7/10 - Their poor scrum was exposed against Ireland. They have the best flanker in the world in David Pocock though who put in what was possibly the performance of the tournament against South Africa.
Italy 4/10 - Italy shoulda been looking to challenge both Australia and Ireland. Instead hey were beaten fairly convincingly by both.

USA 7/10 - Denied Ireland a bonus point and almost did the same against Italy

Russia 5/10 -
They may have lost all their matches, but it was their first world cup. They managed to score 3 tries against Aus and Italy and 2 against Ireland.


Pool D

South Africa 7/10 - Topped the toughest group and were unfortunate not to make the semis. Still, by their standards not a great tourney.

Wales 9/10 - Looked world class. They dominated Ireland in the quarters and had they 15 men woulda destroyed France. Can consider themselves unlucky not to have been in the final. Who knows what coulda happened then?

Samoa 7/10 - Could definitely have made the quarters had it not been for poor refereeing decisions and discriminatory fixture scheduling. They brought this discrimination to our attention and hopefully the IRB will work on fixtures favouring bigger teams less in 2015.

Fiji 2/10 - What a huge fall from grace. They looked like a minnow team. Their huge 66-0 loss to Wales was a very low point for Fijian rugby

Namibia 4/10 - Didn't too much to impress. They were comprehensively beaten by every team they faced.
 
Scotland 4/10

One point for each try they scored. Played their hearts out in the last three games, however not good enough/ incompetence.
 
I agree that Fiji were the worst team of the tournament(even though they beat Namibia a game in which they only played well from 20th minute to 60th) they were absolutely brutal in their other three games, and were not playing the Flying Fijian rugby that we have come to expect. They were not at all competitive vs. South Africa and Wales, and Samoa contained them quite easily as well.

I might give Italy a slightly higher rating maybe a 5/10, and as well Samoa I would give an 8/10.
 
I agree that Fiji were the worst team of the tournament(even though they beat Namibia a game in which they only played well from 20th minute to 60th) they were absolutely brutal in their other three games, and were not playing the Flying Fijian rugby that we have come to expect. They were not at all competitive vs. South Africa and Wales, and Samoa contained them quite easily as well.

I might give Italy a slightly higher rating maybe a 5/10, and as well Samoa I would give an 8/10.

They dominated Namibia, so they obviously were not the worst team. Fiji at full strength (which they clearly were not at in this world cup) would beat the likes of Canada, Tonga and Japan the majority of the time, they just have more rugby ability.

Fiji is the most politically corrupt nation that play rugby, they have major real life issues. Fiji also had players that didn't play because of fear of their club contract getting torn up.

Tonga, Japan, Canada, Romania, Georgia, USA, Russia and I'd go as far as to say even Italy would have finished with a record of 1-3 if they were in the group that Fiji was in.

Fiji may not have performed to their potential, but they still won a game so they weren't the worst. Even still they had a very difficult group which even if they played well, in all likeliness would have lost 3 games. Wales, South Africa and Samoa were just too good.
 
considering fiji's rugby reputation they are the worst team this world cup
 
considering fiji's rugby reputation they are the worst team this world cup

Shouldn't be judged on reputation IMO, like how can Ireland claim to have a better World Cup then Aussie lol?
France nearly won the whole thing and they get a 7? be realisitic
 
Well everything's relative, isn't it?

These are ratings relative to expectation, I suppose.
 
Honestly NZ get a 10, they achieved everything I expected or even hoped of them. Well done boys
 
They dominated Namibia, so they obviously were not the worst team. Fiji at full strength (which they clearly were not at in this world cup) would beat the likes of Canada, Tonga and Japan the majority of the time, they just have more rugby ability.

Fiji is the most politically corrupt nation that play rugby, they have major real life issues. Fiji also had players that didn't play because of fear of their club contract getting torn up.

Tonga, Japan, Canada, Romania, Georgia, USA, Russia and I'd go as far as to say even Italy would have finished with a record of 1-3 if they were in the group that Fiji was in.

Fiji may not have performed to their potential, but they still won a game so they weren't the worst. Even still they had a very difficult group which even if they played well, in all likeliness would have lost 3 games. Wales, South Africa and Samoa were just too good.

Dominated Namibia my butt, they looked like crap in that game in the first twenty and in the last twenty, it was also Namibia's second closest RWC match after their game vs. Ireland. These were relative rankings anyway, I knew someone would come on and argue this point, just to have an argument.

The teams you mentioned may very well also have gone 1-3 in that pool but I think they would have had closer matches than Fiji. Fiji looked AWFUL in their three losses being outscored in all three combined 142-10.

Of course France should get a 7/10 they lost to Tonga and NZ twice. Struggled until the 70th minute mark vs. Japan and Canada, beat a 14 man Wales barely and nearly blew a 16 point lead vs. England. To their credit they grinded out the results but it would be hard to give them a better ranking than 7/10.
 
In all honesty we are rated too high. 8/10 would be fair. We came through our group and put on a great display against Ireland but struggled against a poor French side and disinterested Aussie team. Without Adam, Sam and Rhys we looked poor. I suppose we can say if this happened then we would have done that, but when it comes down to it we once again couldn't put a big side away. Still, chin up and look towards the future, eh?
 
Dominated Namibia my butt, they looked like crap in that game in the first twenty and in the last twenty, it was also Namibia's second closest RWC match after their game vs. Ireland. These were relative rankings anyway, I knew someone would come on and argue this point, just to have an argument.

The teams you mentioned may very well also have gone 1-3 in that pool but I think they would have had closer matches than Fiji. Fiji looked AWFUL in their three losses being outscored in all three combined 142-10.

Of course France should get a 7/10 they lost to Tonga and NZ twice. Struggled until the 70th minute mark vs. Japan and Canada, beat a 14 man Wales barely and nearly blew a 16 point lead vs. England. To their credit they grinded out the results but it would be hard to give them a better ranking than 7/10.

Isn't the point of making this thread to discuss it lol?

I only defended Fiji because you had a dig at them lol, I am a fan of Fijian rugby and you are fan of Canadian rugby. Its ok to discuss these things, don't take it personally lol. I think we can agree to disagree on this.

France did what they had to do to make the final, like it or not they could have won.
If they did win, the way they played in the final they would have been worthy champions.

They overcame a lot, France deserve credit where credits due they deserve at least a 9 I reckon.
 
Ireland have pretty sad expectations then haha
They beat the number 2 ranked side in the world - Just because they didn't win the whole thing doesn't mean you can ridicule them - Lets all laugh at Russia because they've never won the WC HAHAHAHAHAHAHA THEY'RE SAD
 
They beat the number 2 ranked side in the world - Just because they didn't win the whole thing doesn't mean you can ridicule them - Lets all laugh at Russia because they've never won the WC HAHAHAHAHAHAHA THEY'RE SAD
]

I think Ireland shouldn't be happy with a QF, they have a lot of potential. They should expect to make at least a semi.
 
Isn't the point of making this thread to discuss it lol?

I only defended Fiji because you had a dig at them lol, I am a fan of Fijian rugby and you are fan of Canadian rugby. Its ok to discuss these things, don't take it personally lol. I think we can agree to disagree on this.

France did what they had to do to make the final, like it or not they could have won.
If they did win, the way they played in the final they would have been worthy champions.

They overcame a lot, France deserve credit where credits due they deserve at least a 9 I reckon.

I guess my point was I thought it was fairly obvious these were relative rankings, although King D'Arcy did not explicitly state that in his original post, so my apologies as I can understand how you misinterpreted my original comment that Fiji had been the "worst" team at the RWC.
 
Yeah, I probably should state that the rankings are relative to the teams expectations prior to the tournament.
 
Yeah, I probably should state that the rankings are relative to the teams expectations prior to the tournament.

Even with that criteria France were better than a 7 don't you think? They came a kick away from being champions, against the best team in the world.
 

Latest posts

Top